From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Bosko Radivojevic" Subject: GRE keepalive support Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2008 12:32:56 +0200 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=wCFSwTwQJ0maa14buX9l/Mig3bWfNCMpQn9zmIe5seU=; b=DXJ4Sat27cNNRe5zAYhGq3kYXjMmLTNNOiG19BeznA7IZ7IiePkJpMX/pVn3iqo+os BqoEvk3NLaEOBerGpiYPec99EqrPlM/HX8wg01k7c6mxhYGbycOd2K3U6XTn8IxzI0OS t/LbNZwZBmKhv1tuZbZt+EDc78E26wBBwx948= Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter@vger.kernel.org Hi all, I hope I'm sending this question to the right mailing list(s). After a few hours of googling I realized that there is no support for GRE keepalives in Linux. Or, better to say, GRE keepalives are Cisco's "proprietary" feature. The project I'm currently working for needs GRE keepalives on Linux side (besides possibility to run some routing protocol over GRE) in order to have "link state" information. It looks implementing that feature on Linux is not too complicated and I'll give a try. Are there any obstacles I'm currently unable to see? Maybe there is a reason why GRE keepalives are not implemented? Except lack of detailed documentation :) So, any comments are welcome. Thanks!