From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Vehent Subject: Re: QoS weirdness : HTB accuracy Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 16:29:21 +0200 Message-ID: References: <067c83163988908ef546d7ff7f560a17@localhost> <4BF32BB0.7010700@redfish-solutions.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=linuxwall.info; h= mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:date:from:to :cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:message-id; s=lnw-dkim; bh=DH bjhf/rSlE9wrlJ2/ukASTadkFQH5iDHVass4Pb9oc=; b=AKnFO+25cJNgJg8v0I ki/Ax1tJlPwKZVUIiwL4j7GbH4E5i01cOouOq1Qu5assMDOhfKLFblfeGubYeb6T 1dMBbERZUAidIE0PsY87jW5QULTaohOvcoq9BuQ+8h9/QS108FlWXa121uWtGv5F tMcpg7B4ef2hY7MSOK3hWlrUE= In-Reply-To: <4BF32BB0.7010700@redfish-solutions.com> Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: "Philip A. Prindeville" Cc: Netdev , netfilter On Tue, 18 May 2010 18:07:12 -0600, "Philip A. Prindeville" wrote: > > Sorry for the late response: could this be an "aliasing" issue caused > by sampling intervals (granularity)? > > -Philip I was, in fact, an error in my ruleset. I had put the 'linklayer atm' at both the branch and leaf levels, so the overhead was computed twice, creating those holes in the bandwidth. Julien