Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Eduardo Fernández" <efgonzalez@gmail.com>
To: "Sadus ." <sadus@swiftbin.net>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Load Balancing / Merging speed
Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 01:00:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fedfc2605052116003feb49b0@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1116715548.2529.142.camel@debianbox>

Hi,

On 5/22/05, Sadus . <sadus@swiftbin.net> wrote:
> I can't seem to find the archive, i searched untill June 2004?
> link aggregation
> Basicaly i knew that i could do such a thing using Bonding/Trunking/Link
> Aggragation but is there a simpler way using iptables/iproute only and
> using only 1 NIC (with 2 different IPs/Subnets)

Bonding? You don't use that to merge two internet lines, that's for
making two NIC's work as if they were only one, thus doubling the
speed. With bonding linux "sees" one device where you had two. You can
only set up bonding between two computers or between a computer and a
switch which supports bonding (it's got different names depending on
the brand).

> thanks
> 
> On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 00:33 +0200, Kenneth Kalmer wrote:
> > On 5/21/05, Sadus . <sadus@swiftbin.net> wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > If i want to search for HOWTOs that can enable me to merge the
> > > connection speed of multiple providers (inboud/outbound), what should i
> > > search for?
> >
> > The nano howto if I'm not mistaken, and have a look at the eql qdisc
> > and teql device.
> >
> > >
> > > what i mean by merging is, lets say my connection is shaped at 100K and
> > > the other is also shaped at 100K, i want to be able using the 2 ISPs to
> > > have 200K (in/out),
> > >
> > > Does anyone have a HOWTO or Article about that Matter?
> >
> > I asked a similar question in the list not too long ago. Search the
> > archives for the subject "Spill over" and have a look. There was some
> > excellent replies from other members on the topic. I have honestly not
> > had the chance to properly test the configurations myself, but from my
> > searching and discussions here it won't be an easy feat to achieve.
> >
> > Relative load balancing is not that difficult, but to fully maximize
> > the utilization of each link is another story.

Cheers!

Edu


  reply	other threads:[~2005-05-21 23:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-21  6:55 Load Balancing / Merging speed Sadus .
2005-05-21 22:33 ` Kenneth Kalmer
2005-05-21 22:45   ` Sadus .
2005-05-21 23:00     ` Eduardo Fernández [this message]
2005-05-21 23:01       ` Sadus .
2005-05-22  2:02       ` Kenneth Kalmer
2005-05-22  7:56         ` Sadus .
2005-05-21 23:06 ` Jason Opperisano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fedfc2605052116003feb49b0@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=efgonzalez@gmail.com \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    --cc=sadus@swiftbin.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox