From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ram Krishna Subject: memory leak after enabling bridge-netfilter Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:32:33 +0530 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:received:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=QZWOTmYo+QPrs9wbJNayGhOcIsBxcwRZOOt/1nxXT7M=; b=A3fcDdCMME3aW2SW4nQjO2a4PkBxh+nuB1IuP4YKCfU/Ndj5yqX5YvKlNNQ46eiTrU OXumg8V1bT+MEoEmZLhwu9g12yNIQbstso2oZpuQ1NKM8qXOyW+Noxn1sOyc2dIl2Uco qiEkuEIQv2GYJOe9LeN74JnlGDKgKj0LRJA6U= Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org I am running my linux box as a bridge. The kernel version is 2.6.18-3 I have enabled bridge-netfilter and iptables. I am seeing a memory leak in the slab "size-64", even when I have not set any iptables rules. If I dont enable the bridge-netfilter and iptables kernel options then there is no memory leak in bridge mode. Is there any patch known to fix this memory leak? Appreciate any inputs on this. The exact kernel options I have enabled are: CONFIG_NETFILTER=y CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER=y CONFIG_NETFILTER_XTABLES=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_MARK=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_NFQUEUE=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_MARK=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_MULTIPORT=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_PKTTYPE=m CONFIG_IP_NF_IPTABLES=m CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_IPRANGE=m CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_ADDRTYPE=m CONFIG_IP_NF_FILTER=m CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_REJECT=m CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_ADDRTYPE=m CONFIG_IP_NF_FILTER=m CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_REJECT=m CONFIG_BRIDGE=m CONFIG_VLAN_8021Q=y thanks, Krishna