From: "Allan de Borde" <Allan@southport-college.ac.uk>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: AW: Load Balancing
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 10:12:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <se914f2f.073@hera> (raw)
Thanks,
I seem to how it up and running at the moment. I will read about these patches and then take it this step further.
Allan
>>> "Michael Schoen" <schoen@anduras.de> 04/06/03 04:47am >>>
Hi Allan,
it s probably not a problem of iptables - try with the following kernel
patches...
http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#routes
--
Michael Schön <schoen@anduras.de>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org [mailto:netfilter-
> admin@lists.netfilter.org] Im Auftrag von Allan de Borde
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. April 2003 09:40
> An: mgm@paktronix.com
> Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
> Betreff: Re: Load Balancing
>
> Thanks,
>
> I didn't have the Kernel Development installed so installed it and
then I
> could compile the latest iproute.
> With this version of iproute the ip route list command has lost the
dead
> onlink pervasive message
> and it all looks ok. I will have to test further but it's looking
good.
>
> Cheers,
> Allan
>
> >>> "Matthew G. Marsh" <mgm@paktronix.com> 04/02/03 05:43pm >>>
> On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Allan de Borde wrote:
>
> > I am trying to test the load balancing on a test machine with 2
external
> > 2Mb Internet links and it doesn't appear to be working. I am using
> > RedHat 8.0 and get this message when doing ip route list:
> >
> > default equalize
> > nexthop via xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx dev eth1 weight 1 dead onlink
> pervasive
> > nexthop via xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx dev eth0 weight 1 onlink
> >
> > I have read a similar problem from this list and it appears that the
> > RedHat RPM of iproute2 (iproute-2.4.7-5) is broken and this was
resolved
> > by installing a newer version of iproute.
> >
> > As I am very new to some aspects of Linux could someone inform me of
how
> > to compile and install iproute as it asks for you to change the
> > KERNEL_INCLUDE directory in the Makefile and I have no idea where
the
> > Kernel include directory is. I can't get it to make.
>
> KERNEL_INCLUDE=/usr/src/linux
>
> Even RH symlinks /usr/src/linux to the appropriate version of kernel
> installed. Make sure that you have installed the kernel development
RPM as
> that has the actual include files. Not installed by default unless you
> installed the Developer workstation.
>
> > I have downloaded and installed iproute-2.4.7-7.rpm but this also
has
> the same problems.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Allan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> Matthew G. Marsh, President
> Paktronix Systems LLC
> 1506 North 59th Street
> Omaha NE 68104
> Phone: (402) 553-2288
> Email: mgm@paktronix.com
> WWW: http://www.paktronix.com
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
reply other threads:[~2003-04-07 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=se914f2f.073@hera \
--to=allan@southport-college.ac.uk \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox