From: Jorge Davila <davila@nicaraguaopensource.com>
To: noa levy <noalevy@gmail.com>, netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: SNAT before IPSec
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:15:21 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <web-74829660@bk1.webmaillogin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8bd3dfad0706050529s484d42b6t9ef4ae0fd1730367@mail.gmail.com>
I'm guessing that you can use the "normal" approach and apply the SNAT rules
to the outgoing traffic flowing in the ipsec interfaces.
The ipsec encryption algorithm is a kernel space tool and iptables is a user
space tool to the netfilter kernel module.
All traffic that pass the POSTROUTING chain in the NAT table is leaving the
firewall box (through a physical interface e.g.:eth0 or through a virtual
interface e.g.:ipsec0).
Jorge Davila..
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:29:47 +0300
"noa levy" <noalevy@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a setup where I need to SNAT traffic that will be going out via
> an IPSec tunnel. The NAT must take place before the IPSec
> encryption+encapsulation, so I need the packet to first go through
> SNAT and then match an IPSec policy. After being IPSec-ified, I need
> the packets to go through routing again.
> My question:
> SNAT takes place in POST_ROUTING. Can IPSec be applied after that? I
> have read that after IPSec the packet gets injected to LOCAL_OUT
> again, but when does the actual IPSec policy decision take place?
> Won't it happen *before* SNAT? Can I control it?
>
> Thanks,
> Noa
>
>
Jorge Isaac Davila Lopez
Nicaragua Open Source
+505 430 5462
davila@nicaraguaopensource.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-05 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-05 12:29 SNAT before IPSec noa levy
2007-06-05 12:56 ` Yasuyuki KOZAKAI
2007-06-05 14:36 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-05 20:15 ` Jorge Davila [this message]
2007-06-05 20:28 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-05 20:45 ` Jorge Davila
2007-06-05 23:53 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-06 15:39 ` Jorge Davila
2007-06-06 18:48 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-05 21:29 ` noa levy
2007-06-05 22:40 ` Jorge Davila
2007-06-05 22:40 ` noa levy
2007-06-05 22:59 ` Jorge Davila
2007-06-05 23:05 ` noa levy
2007-06-06 15:47 ` Jorge Davila
2007-06-07 15:40 ` noa levy
2007-06-07 16:36 ` Jorge Davila
2007-06-07 17:07 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-07 18:03 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-07 20:57 ` Jorge Davila
2007-06-08 17:57 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-05 22:43 ` Jorge Davila
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=web-74829660@bk1.webmaillogin.com \
--to=davila@nicaraguaopensource.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=noalevy@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox