From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25D4C3C0634 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2026 10:50:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774867806; cv=none; b=SB+Xv+OtO/NBrV1lyutk0ddPkqfa5/GsRbZmw6rUbLgboR21vcRKmPCevW+y9xajOedC+fcnXPDdkPWXiF0AGVGO4DXwNXNoJ447/Aebs83qBUFbRP8q+y5M0rRhNqJb67Y0E9tAN+cGItxt6o/4Ej4yEfdBvCmfh0Hq644KDcQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774867806; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rkX3ZpoDYjVfKThIe6nRJg+WV4QDMgWCxcdEimVscKw=; h=In-Reply-To:References:To:Cc:Subject:MIME-Version:From:Date: Message-ID:Content-Type; b=O1XHizANpXRkE77HloRQ7qKLw6/FVat9TOr+3jZ0z9GwijAeBVBYvoBukF3bntXaSKoZL4DFyFGjTgssBC147uIEBdINlrRLIF0eNQeujle1Sgrc8C7o4MOG5kOSMlIgRGG5DuRPUKJmT46QRpgW21+af3fQ0Petvnhjzl1r3Gw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=P0n734+T; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="P0n734+T" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1774867804; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=4WG/SeRSfzsyNWeLhZKLjrg2/KPXx46Pf/FiBPy0PmY=; b=P0n734+TJcw6deuQFQwCd1i5cE985h1zhEMPRyqL4gYZMmqIJqtR8aXzR+pe8+VQZ6KrGG MwGX6XkRqaJ0gAYRSMZzM9TDyCHZ+DCMh+ie+O1Riy65rl1qoQErLeofLlBzjX49+rx53G VWZ4IYUARgz7+pYQ2LoO/b1QGT4se98= Received: from mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-426-JLNIgM7fPXu4cdrMLHIQ5w-1; Mon, 30 Mar 2026 06:49:58 -0400 X-MC-Unique: JLNIgM7fPXu4cdrMLHIQ5w-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: JLNIgM7fPXu4cdrMLHIQ5w_1774867795 Received: from mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.17]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B30281944F11; Mon, 30 Mar 2026 10:49:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (unknown [10.44.35.245]) by mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 543211955D84; Mon, 30 Mar 2026 10:49:44 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 In-Reply-To: <52ad0aa6-d8dd-4ba1-adf2-f79128df9d90@samba.org> References: <52ad0aa6-d8dd-4ba1-adf2-f79128df9d90@samba.org> <20260326104544.509518-1-dhowells@redhat.com> To: Stefan Metzmacher Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Christian Brauner , Matthew Wilcox , Christoph Hellwig , Steve French , Namjae Jeon , Paulo Alcantara , Jens Axboe , Leon Romanovsky , Steve French , ChenXiaoSong , Marc Dionne , Eric Van Hensbergen , Dominique Martinet , Ilya Dryomov , Trond Myklebust , netfs@lists.linux.dev, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, v9fs@lists.linux.dev, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/26] netfs: Keep track of folios in a segmented bio_vec[] chain Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netfs@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 From: David Howells Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 11:49:41 +0100 Message-ID: <1180465.1774867781@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.17 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: LchIrRH7g7qneNzVSeo7M35RVqc8lBi0fm2T862ezLA_1774867795 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1005366.1774861048.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stefan Metzmacher wrote: > Another possible way would be to skip this for now > cifs: Remove support for ITER_KVEC/BVEC/FOLIOQ from smb_extract_iter_to_r= dma() > and I rebase my changes on top of Davids patches assuming they > will be stable commits (at least up to > cifs: Support ITER_BVECQ in smb_extract_iter_to_rdma()) I could certainly split my removal patch. I want to remove FOLIOQ support, but I can leave KVEC and/or BVEC if they're still needed. David