netfs.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "NeilBrown" <neil@brown.name>
To: "Al Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>,
	"Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>, "David Howells" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	"Chuck Lever" <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
	"Jeff Layton" <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, netfs@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] VFS: rename lookup_one_len family to lookup_noperm and remove permission check
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 12:31:50 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <174312551036.9342.16822785547327803699@noble.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250322003403.GE2023217@ZenIV>

On Sat, 22 Mar 2025, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 02:01:35PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> 
> Quite a few of those should be switched to a common helper,
> lifted out of debugfs/tracefs start_creating()...

The next batch of patches will add "lookup_and_lock" family of functions
and change various calls to use them, including the "start_creating"
functions. 

The goal there is to get all the code for lock/unlock around
create/remove/rename to be in namei.c so we can change it in one place.

Thanks,
NeilBrown


> 
> I can live with that, but it'll cause fuckloads of noise in
> persistency queue... ;-/
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-28  1:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-19  3:01 [PATCH 0/6 RFC v2] tidy up various VFS lookup functions NeilBrown
2025-03-19  3:01 ` [PATCH 1/6] VFS: improve interface for lookup_one functions NeilBrown
2025-03-19  8:40   ` Christian Brauner
2025-03-20 10:17   ` Jeff Layton
2025-03-22  0:27   ` Al Viro
2025-03-28  1:14     ` NeilBrown
2025-03-19  3:01 ` [PATCH 2/6] nfsd: Use lookup_one() rather than lookup_one_len() NeilBrown
2025-03-19 13:04   ` Chuck Lever
2025-03-20 10:19   ` Jeff Layton
2025-03-19  3:01 ` [PATCH 3/6] cachefiles: " NeilBrown
2025-03-20 10:22   ` Jeff Layton
2025-03-20 12:05     ` Christian Brauner
2025-03-20 13:49     ` David Howells
2025-03-20 14:04       ` Christian Brauner
2025-03-19  3:01 ` [PATCH 4/6] VFS: rename lookup_one_len family to lookup_noperm and remove permission check NeilBrown
2025-03-20 10:29   ` Jeff Layton
2025-03-22  0:34   ` Al Viro
2025-03-28  1:31     ` NeilBrown [this message]
2025-03-19  3:01 ` [PATCH 5/6] Use try_lookup_noperm() instead of d_hash_and_lookup() outside of VFS NeilBrown
2025-03-20 10:45   ` Jeff Layton
2025-03-22  0:39   ` Al Viro
2025-03-19  3:01 ` [PATCH 6/6] VFS: change lookup_one_common and lookup_noperm_common to take a qstr NeilBrown
2025-03-20 10:46   ` Jeff Layton
2025-03-19  8:42 ` [PATCH 0/6 RFC v2] tidy up various VFS lookup functions Christian Brauner
2025-03-19  9:23   ` NeilBrown
2025-03-20 14:04 ` [PATCH 1/6] VFS: improve interface for lookup_one functions David Howells
2025-03-22  0:29   ` Al Viro
2025-03-28  1:18   ` NeilBrown
2025-04-04 13:41     ` Christian Brauner
2025-04-04 13:46       ` Christian Brauner
2025-04-04 23:00         ` NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=174312551036.9342.16822785547327803699@noble.neil.brown.name \
    --to=neil@brown.name \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).