From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.com>,
Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@microsoft.com>,
Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
netfs@lists.linux.dev, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>,
Shyam Prasad N <nspmangalore@gmail.com>,
Rohith Surabattula <rohiths.msft@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/12] cifs: Cut over to using netfslib
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 10:52:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240209105251.GE1516992@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240205225726.3104808-10-dhowells@redhat.com>
On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 10:57:21PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
...
> diff --git a/fs/smb/client/smb2pdu.c b/fs/smb/client/smb2pdu.c
> index 84e3675eb41e..b58fdee40755 100644
> --- a/fs/smb/client/smb2pdu.c
> +++ b/fs/smb/client/smb2pdu.c
> @@ -4386,10 +4386,12 @@ smb2_new_read_req(void **buf, unsigned int *total_len,
> req->Length = cpu_to_le32(io_parms->length);
> req->Offset = cpu_to_le64(io_parms->offset);
>
> - trace_smb3_read_enter(0 /* xid */,
> - io_parms->persistent_fid,
> - io_parms->tcon->tid, io_parms->tcon->ses->Suid,
> - io_parms->offset, io_parms->length);
> + trace_smb3_read_enter(rdata ? rdata->rreq->debug_id : 0,
> + rdata ? rdata->subreq.debug_index : 0,
> + rdata ? rdata->xid : 0,
> + io_parms->persistent_fid,
> + io_parms->tcon->tid, io_parms->tcon->ses->Suid,
> + io_parms->offset, io_parms->length);
> #ifdef CONFIG_CIFS_SMB_DIRECT
Hi David,
above some care is taken to handle the case where rdata might be NULL.
However, the code below this hunk, other than being guarded by
smb3_use_rdma_offload(io_parms), uses rdata unconditionally.
Perhaps the guard makes this ok. But Smatch flags this inconsistency.
And I thought I should bring it to your attention.
For reference the code I am referring to looks like this:
#ifdef CONFIG_CIFS_SMB_DIRECT
/*
* If we want to do a RDMA write, fill in and append
* smbd_buffer_descriptor_v1 to the end of read request
*/
if (smb3_use_rdma_offload(io_parms)) {
struct smbd_buffer_descriptor_v1 *v1;
bool need_invalidate = server->dialect == SMB30_PROT_ID;
rdata->mr = smbd_register_mr(server->smbd_conn, &rdata->subreq.io_iter,
true, need_invalidate);
if (!rdata->mr)
return -EAGAIN;
...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-09 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-05 22:57 [PATCH v5 00/12] netfs, cifs: Delegate high-level I/O to netfslib David Howells
2024-02-05 22:57 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] cifs: Replace cifs_readdata with a wrapper around netfs_io_subrequest David Howells
2024-02-05 22:57 ` [PATCH v5 02/12] cifs: Set zero_point in the copy_file_range() and remap_file_range() David Howells
2024-02-05 22:57 ` [PATCH v5 03/12] cifs: Replace cifs_writedata with a wrapper around netfs_io_subrequest David Howells
2024-02-05 22:57 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] cifs: Use more fields from netfs_io_subrequest David Howells
2024-02-05 22:57 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] cifs: Make wait_mtu_credits take size_t args David Howells
2024-02-05 22:57 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] cifs: Implement netfslib hooks David Howells
2024-02-05 22:57 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] cifs: Replace the writedata replay bool with a netfs sreq flag David Howells
2024-02-05 22:57 ` [PATCH v5 08/12] cifs: Move cifs_loose_read_iter() and cifs_file_write_iter() to file.c David Howells
2024-02-05 22:57 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] cifs: Cut over to using netfslib David Howells
2024-02-09 10:52 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2024-02-09 10:59 ` Simon Horman
2024-02-19 15:06 ` David Howells
2024-02-19 15:10 ` David Howells
2024-02-20 13:31 ` Simon Horman
2024-02-19 16:12 ` David Howells
2024-02-05 22:57 ` [PATCH v5 10/12] cifs: Remove some code that's no longer used, part 1 David Howells
2024-02-05 22:57 ` [PATCH v5 11/12] cifs: Remove some code that's no longer used, part 2 David Howells
2024-02-05 22:57 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] cifs: Remove some code that's no longer used, part 3 David Howells
2024-02-08 3:55 ` [PATCH v5 00/12] netfs, cifs: Delegate high-level I/O to netfslib Steve French
2024-02-19 15:30 ` David Howells
2024-02-19 15:42 ` David Howells
2024-02-19 16:12 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240209105251.GE1516992@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=nspmangalore@gmail.com \
--cc=pc@manguebit.com \
--cc=rohiths.msft@gmail.com \
--cc=sfrench@samba.org \
--cc=smfrench@gmail.com \
--cc=sprasad@microsoft.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).