Linux network filesystem support library
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: aaptel@suse.com,dhowells@redhat.com,gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,jlayton@kernel.org,netfs@lists.linux.dev,pc@manguebit.com,smfrench@gmail.com,stfrench@microsoft.com,tom@talpey.com
Cc: <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "cifs: Fix server re-repick on subrequest retry" has been added to the 6.10-stable tree
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 13:23:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024072354-drained-vision-44ea@gregkh> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    cifs: Fix server re-repick on subrequest retry

to the 6.10-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     cifs-fix-server-re-repick-on-subrequest-retry.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.10 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


From de40579b903883274fe203865f29d66b168b7236 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 20:19:32 +0100
Subject: cifs: Fix server re-repick on subrequest retry

From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

commit de40579b903883274fe203865f29d66b168b7236 upstream.

When a subrequest is marked for needing retry, netfs will call
cifs_prepare_write() which will make cifs repick the server for the op
before renegotiating credits; it then calls cifs_issue_write() which
invokes smb2_async_writev() - which re-repicks the server.

If a different server is then selected, this causes the increment of
server->in_flight to happen against one record and the decrement to happen
against another, leading to misaccounting.

Fix this by just removing the repick code in smb2_async_writev().  As this
is only called from netfslib-driven code, cifs_prepare_write() should
always have been called first, and so server should never be NULL and the
preparatory step is repeated in the event that we do a retry.

The problem manifests as a warning looking something like:

 WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 72896 at fs/smb/client/smb2ops.c:97 smb2_add_credits+0x3f0/0x9e0 [cifs]
 ...
 RIP: 0010:smb2_add_credits+0x3f0/0x9e0 [cifs]
 ...
  smb2_writev_callback+0x334/0x560 [cifs]
  cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x77a/0x11b0 [cifs]
  kthread+0x187/0x1d0
  ret_from_fork+0x34/0x60
  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

Which may be triggered by a number of different xfstests running against an
Azure server in multichannel mode.  generic/249 seems the most repeatable,
but generic/215, generic/249 and generic/308 may also show it.

Fixes: 3ee1a1fc3981 ("cifs: Cut over to using netfslib")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara (Red Hat) <pc@manguebit.com>
Acked-by: Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
cc: Aurelien Aptel <aaptel@suse.com>
cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/smb/client/smb2pdu.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/smb/client/smb2pdu.c b/fs/smb/client/smb2pdu.c
index 2ae2dbb6202b..bb84a89e5905 100644
--- a/fs/smb/client/smb2pdu.c
+++ b/fs/smb/client/smb2pdu.c
@@ -4859,9 +4859,6 @@ smb2_async_writev(struct cifs_io_subrequest *wdata)
 	struct cifs_io_parms *io_parms = NULL;
 	int credit_request;
 
-	if (!wdata->server || test_bit(NETFS_SREQ_RETRYING, &wdata->subreq.flags))
-		server = wdata->server = cifs_pick_channel(tcon->ses);
-
 	/*
 	 * in future we may get cifs_io_parms passed in from the caller,
 	 * but for now we construct it here...
-- 
2.45.2



Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from dhowells@redhat.com are

queue-6.10/cifs-fix-server-re-repick-on-subrequest-retry.patch
queue-6.10/cifs-fix-setting-of-zero_point-after-dio-write.patch
queue-6.10/cifs-fix-missing-error-code-set.patch
queue-6.10/cifs-fix-missing-fscache-invalidation.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2024-07-23 11:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2024072354-drained-vision-44ea@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=aaptel@suse.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pc@manguebit.com \
    --cc=smfrench@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stfrench@microsoft.com \
    --cc=tom@talpey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox