Linux network filesystem support library
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Christian Ebner <c.ebner@proxmox.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, jlayton@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	netfs@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH stable 6.11.y] netfs: reset subreq->iov_iter before netfs_clear_unread() tail clean
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 06:08:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024111053-expectant-moodiness-6118@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fac697e2-22aa-40e5-942a-a6e40efee0b2@proxmox.com>

On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 12:51:14PM +0100, Christian Ebner wrote:
> On 11/6/24 09:35, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 09:26:46AM +0100, Christian Ebner wrote:
> > 
> > Please try testing the original fixes and providing them as a patch
> > series and send them for us to review.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> as mentioned, the original series does not apply on stable-6.11.y and
> securely and correctly back-porting this is out of scope for us, given
> resource and time constraints.

Please note that taking one-off backports to stable trees, increases our
workload over time and almost always is not the correct thing to do as
it diverges code streams.  So while this seems simpler "up front", from
a maintaince point of view, is almost always the wrong thing.

> The main intend was to contribute back a patch which is also back-portable
> to older kernels. This seems unfeasible with the huge original patch series.
> The submitted patch has successfully been tested on our side and fixes the
> issue for affected customers which were willing to test the patch.

That's great, but we really would want the original commits here, OR
approval from the relevant maintainers that "yes, this is really the
only way this can be done for stable trees".

thanks,

greg k-h

      reply	other threads:[~2024-11-10  5:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-27 11:43 [PATCH stable 6.11.y] netfs: reset subreq->iov_iter before netfs_clear_unread() tail clean Christian Ebner
2024-11-06  5:59 ` Greg KH
2024-11-06  8:26   ` Christian Ebner
2024-11-06  8:35     ` Greg KH
2024-11-07 11:51       ` Christian Ebner
2024-11-10  5:08         ` Greg KH [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2024111053-expectant-moodiness-6118@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=c.ebner@proxmox.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox