From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
patches@lists.linux.dev, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>, Zilin Guan <zilin@seu.edu.cn>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
netfs@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.12 011/189] netfs: Fix missing barriers by using clear_and_wake_up_bit()
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 11:35:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250115103606.813324642@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250115103606.357764746@linuxfoundation.org>
6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit aa3956418985bda1f68313eadde3267921847978 ]
Use clear_and_wake_up_bit() rather than something like:
clear_bit_unlock(NETFS_RREQ_IN_PROGRESS, &rreq->flags);
wake_up_bit(&rreq->flags, NETFS_RREQ_IN_PROGRESS);
as there needs to be a barrier inserted between which is present in
clear_and_wake_up_bit().
Fixes: 288ace2f57c9 ("netfs: New writeback implementation")
Fixes: ee4cdf7ba857 ("netfs: Speed up buffered reading")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241213135013.2964079-8-dhowells@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
cc: Zilin Guan <zilin@seu.edu.cn>
cc: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
fs/netfs/read_collect.c | 3 +--
fs/netfs/write_collect.c | 9 +++------
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/netfs/read_collect.c b/fs/netfs/read_collect.c
index 3cbb289535a8..d86fa02f68fb 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/read_collect.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/read_collect.c
@@ -378,8 +378,7 @@ static void netfs_rreq_assess(struct netfs_io_request *rreq)
task_io_account_read(rreq->transferred);
trace_netfs_rreq(rreq, netfs_rreq_trace_wake_ip);
- clear_bit_unlock(NETFS_RREQ_IN_PROGRESS, &rreq->flags);
- wake_up_bit(&rreq->flags, NETFS_RREQ_IN_PROGRESS);
+ clear_and_wake_up_bit(NETFS_RREQ_IN_PROGRESS, &rreq->flags);
trace_netfs_rreq(rreq, netfs_rreq_trace_done);
netfs_clear_subrequests(rreq, false);
diff --git a/fs/netfs/write_collect.c b/fs/netfs/write_collect.c
index 1d438be2e1b4..82290c92ba7a 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/write_collect.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/write_collect.c
@@ -501,8 +501,7 @@ static void netfs_collect_write_results(struct netfs_io_request *wreq)
goto need_retry;
if ((notes & MADE_PROGRESS) && test_bit(NETFS_RREQ_PAUSE, &wreq->flags)) {
trace_netfs_rreq(wreq, netfs_rreq_trace_unpause);
- clear_bit_unlock(NETFS_RREQ_PAUSE, &wreq->flags);
- wake_up_bit(&wreq->flags, NETFS_RREQ_PAUSE);
+ clear_and_wake_up_bit(NETFS_RREQ_PAUSE, &wreq->flags);
}
if (notes & NEED_REASSESS) {
@@ -605,8 +604,7 @@ void netfs_write_collection_worker(struct work_struct *work)
_debug("finished");
trace_netfs_rreq(wreq, netfs_rreq_trace_wake_ip);
- clear_bit_unlock(NETFS_RREQ_IN_PROGRESS, &wreq->flags);
- wake_up_bit(&wreq->flags, NETFS_RREQ_IN_PROGRESS);
+ clear_and_wake_up_bit(NETFS_RREQ_IN_PROGRESS, &wreq->flags);
if (wreq->iocb) {
size_t written = min(wreq->transferred, wreq->len);
@@ -714,8 +712,7 @@ void netfs_write_subrequest_terminated(void *_op, ssize_t transferred_or_error,
trace_netfs_sreq(subreq, netfs_sreq_trace_terminated);
- clear_bit_unlock(NETFS_SREQ_IN_PROGRESS, &subreq->flags);
- wake_up_bit(&subreq->flags, NETFS_SREQ_IN_PROGRESS);
+ clear_and_wake_up_bit(NETFS_SREQ_IN_PROGRESS, &subreq->flags);
/* If we are at the head of the queue, wake up the collector,
* transferring a ref to it if we were the ones to do so.
--
2.39.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-15 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20250115103606.357764746@linuxfoundation.org>
2025-01-15 10:35 ` [PATCH 6.12 009/189] netfs: Fix enomem handling in buffered reads Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-01-15 10:35 ` [PATCH 6.12 010/189] nfs: Fix oops in nfs_netfs_init_request() when copying to cache Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-01-15 10:35 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2025-01-15 10:35 ` [PATCH 6.12 012/189] netfs: Fix ceph copy to cache on write-begin Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-01-15 10:35 ` [PATCH 6.12 013/189] netfs: Fix the (non-)cancellation of copy when cache is temporarily disabled Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-01-15 10:35 ` [PATCH 6.12 014/189] netfs: Fix is-caching check in read-retry Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-01-15 10:36 ` [PATCH 6.12 081/189] netfs: Fix kernel async DIO Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-01-15 10:36 ` [PATCH 6.12 082/189] netfs: Fix read-retry for fs with no ->prepare_read() Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250115103606.813324642@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akiyks@gmail.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zilin@seu.edu.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox