From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
patches@lists.linux.dev, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.org>,
Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
netfs@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 7.0 266/461] netfs: Fix potential UAF in netfs_unlock_abandoned_read_pages()
Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 21:46:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260528194654.866476259@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260528194646.819809818@linuxfoundation.org>
7.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit dbe556972100fabb8e5a1b3d2163831ff07b1e8e ]
netfs_unlock_abandoned_read_pages(rreq) accesses the index of the folios it
is wanting to unlock and compares that to rreq->no_unlock_folio so that it
doesn't unlock a folio being read for netfs_perform_write() or
netfs_write_begin().
However, given that netfs_unlock_abandoned_read_pages() is called _after_
NETFS_RREQ_IN_PROGRESS is cleared, the one folio that it's not allowed to
dereference is the one specified by ->no_unlock_folio as ownership
immediately reverts to the caller.
Fix this by storing the folio pointer instead and using that rather than
the index. Also fix netfs_unlock_read_folio() where the same applies.
Fixes: ee4cdf7ba857 ("netfs: Speed up buffered reading")
Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260414082004.3756080-1-dhowells%40redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260512123404.719402-20-dhowells@redhat.com
cc: Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.org>
cc: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
fs/netfs/buffered_read.c | 4 ++--
fs/netfs/read_collect.c | 2 +-
fs/netfs/read_retry.c | 2 +-
include/linux/netfs.h | 2 +-
4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c b/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c
index 004d426c02b41..83d0b8153e96e 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ int netfs_write_begin(struct netfs_inode *ctx,
ret = PTR_ERR(rreq);
goto error;
}
- rreq->no_unlock_folio = folio->index;
+ rreq->no_unlock_folio = folio;
__set_bit(NETFS_RREQ_NO_UNLOCK_FOLIO, &rreq->flags);
ret = netfs_begin_cache_read(rreq, ctx);
@@ -736,7 +736,7 @@ int netfs_prefetch_for_write(struct file *file, struct folio *folio,
goto error;
}
- rreq->no_unlock_folio = folio->index;
+ rreq->no_unlock_folio = folio;
__set_bit(NETFS_RREQ_NO_UNLOCK_FOLIO, &rreq->flags);
ret = netfs_begin_cache_read(rreq, ctx);
if (ret == -ENOMEM || ret == -EINTR || ret == -ERESTARTSYS)
diff --git a/fs/netfs/read_collect.c b/fs/netfs/read_collect.c
index 3c9b847885c2a..23660a5901246 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/read_collect.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/read_collect.c
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static void netfs_unlock_read_folio(struct netfs_io_request *rreq,
}
just_unlock:
- if (folio->index == rreq->no_unlock_folio &&
+ if (folio == rreq->no_unlock_folio &&
test_bit(NETFS_RREQ_NO_UNLOCK_FOLIO, &rreq->flags)) {
_debug("no unlock");
} else {
diff --git a/fs/netfs/read_retry.c b/fs/netfs/read_retry.c
index e10eb5a073326..f59a70f3a086b 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/read_retry.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/read_retry.c
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ void netfs_unlock_abandoned_read_pages(struct netfs_io_request *rreq)
struct folio *folio = folioq_folio(p, slot);
if (folio && !folioq_is_marked2(p, slot)) {
- if (folio->index == rreq->no_unlock_folio &&
+ if (folio == rreq->no_unlock_folio &&
test_bit(NETFS_RREQ_NO_UNLOCK_FOLIO,
&rreq->flags)) {
_debug("no unlock");
diff --git a/include/linux/netfs.h b/include/linux/netfs.h
index 4fd1d796ad73b..243c0f7379388 100644
--- a/include/linux/netfs.h
+++ b/include/linux/netfs.h
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ struct netfs_io_request {
unsigned long long collected_to; /* Point we've collected to */
unsigned long long cleaned_to; /* Position we've cleaned folios to */
unsigned long long abandon_to; /* Position to abandon folios to */
- pgoff_t no_unlock_folio; /* Don't unlock this folio after read */
+ const struct folio *no_unlock_folio; /* Don't unlock this folio after read */
unsigned int direct_bv_count; /* Number of elements in direct_bv[] */
unsigned int debug_id;
unsigned int rsize; /* Maximum read size (0 for none) */
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-28 20:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260528194646.819809818@linuxfoundation.org>
2026-05-28 19:46 ` [PATCH 7.0 250/461] netfs: Fix cancellation of a DIO and single read subrequests Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-05-28 19:46 ` [PATCH 7.0 251/461] netfs: Fix missing locking around retry adding new subreqs Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-05-28 19:46 ` [PATCH 7.0 252/461] netfs: Fix missing barriers when accessing stream->subrequests locklessly Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-05-28 19:46 ` [PATCH 7.0 253/461] netfs: Fix netfs_read_to_pagecache() to pause on subreq failure Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-05-28 19:46 ` [PATCH 7.0 254/461] netfs: Fix potential for tearing in ->remote_i_size and ->zero_point Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-05-28 19:46 ` [PATCH 7.0 255/461] netfs: Fix zeropoint update where i_size > remote_i_size Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-05-28 19:46 ` [PATCH 7.0 256/461] netfs: fix VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO() issue in netfs_write_begin() call Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-05-28 19:46 ` [PATCH 7.0 257/461] netfs: Fix overrun check in netfs_extract_user_iter() Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-05-28 19:46 ` [PATCH 7.0 258/461] netfs: Fix netfs_invalidate_folio() to clear dirty bit if all changes gone Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-05-28 19:46 ` [PATCH 7.0 259/461] netfs: Defer the emission of trace_netfs_folio() Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-05-28 19:46 ` [PATCH 7.0 260/461] netfs: Fix streaming write being overwritten Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-05-28 19:46 ` [PATCH 7.0 261/461] netfs: Fix potential deadlock in write-through mode Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-05-28 19:46 ` [PATCH 7.0 262/461] netfs: Fix read-gaps to remove netfs_folio from filled folio Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-05-28 19:46 ` [PATCH 7.0 263/461] netfs: Fix write streaming disablement if fd open O_RDWR Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-05-28 19:46 ` [PATCH 7.0 264/461] netfs: Fix early put of sink folio in netfs_read_gaps() Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-05-28 19:46 ` [PATCH 7.0 265/461] netfs: Fix leak of request in netfs_write_begin() error handling Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-05-28 19:46 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2026-05-28 19:46 ` [PATCH 7.0 267/461] netfs: Fix partial invalidation of streaming-write folio Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-05-28 19:46 ` [PATCH 7.0 268/461] netfs: Fix folio->private handling in netfs_perform_write() Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-05-28 19:46 ` [PATCH 7.0 269/461] netfs: Fix netfs_read_folio() to wait on writeback Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-05-28 19:48 ` [PATCH 7.0 377/461] cifs: Fix undefined variables Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260528194654.866476259@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pc@manguebit.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox