From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com,brauner@kernel.org,demonaxsh@gmail.com,dhowells@redhat.com,gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,netfs@lists.linux.dev,pc@manguebit.org,willy@infradead.org
Cc: <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "netfs: Fix potential UAF in netfs_unlock_abandoned_read_pages()" has been added to the 6.12-stable tree
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 11:06:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026082421-agility-reusable-88f1@gregkh> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
netfs: Fix potential UAF in netfs_unlock_abandoned_read_pages()
to the 6.12-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
netfs-fix-potential-uaf-in-netfs_unlock_abandoned_read_pages.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.12 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
From dbe556972100fabb8e5a1b3d2163831ff07b1e8e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 13:33:56 +0100
Subject: netfs: Fix potential UAF in netfs_unlock_abandoned_read_pages()
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
commit dbe556972100fabb8e5a1b3d2163831ff07b1e8e upstream.
netfs_unlock_abandoned_read_pages(rreq) accesses the index of the folios it
is wanting to unlock and compares that to rreq->no_unlock_folio so that it
doesn't unlock a folio being read for netfs_perform_write() or
netfs_write_begin().
However, given that netfs_unlock_abandoned_read_pages() is called _after_
NETFS_RREQ_IN_PROGRESS is cleared, the one folio that it's not allowed to
dereference is the one specified by ->no_unlock_folio as ownership
immediately reverts to the caller.
Fix this by storing the folio pointer instead and using that rather than
the index. Also fix netfs_unlock_read_folio() where the same applies.
Fixes: ee4cdf7ba857 ("netfs: Speed up buffered reading")
Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260414082004.3756080-1-dhowells%40redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260512123404.719402-20-dhowells@redhat.com
cc: Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.org>
cc: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Shishkin Aleksey <demonaxsh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/netfs/buffered_read.c | 4 ++--
fs/netfs/read_collect.c | 2 +-
fs/netfs/read_retry.c | 2 +-
include/linux/netfs.h | 2 +-
4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c
@@ -734,7 +734,7 @@ retry:
ret = PTR_ERR(rreq);
goto error;
}
- rreq->no_unlock_folio = folio->index;
+ rreq->no_unlock_folio = folio;
__set_bit(NETFS_RREQ_NO_UNLOCK_FOLIO, &rreq->flags);
ret = netfs_begin_cache_read(rreq, ctx);
@@ -800,7 +800,7 @@ int netfs_prefetch_for_write(struct file
goto error;
}
- rreq->no_unlock_folio = folio->index;
+ rreq->no_unlock_folio = folio;
__set_bit(NETFS_RREQ_NO_UNLOCK_FOLIO, &rreq->flags);
ret = netfs_begin_cache_read(rreq, ctx);
if (ret == -ENOMEM || ret == -EINTR || ret == -ERESTARTSYS)
--- a/fs/netfs/read_collect.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/read_collect.c
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static void netfs_unlock_read_folio(stru
}
if (!test_bit(NETFS_RREQ_DONT_UNLOCK_FOLIOS, &rreq->flags)) {
- if (folio->index == rreq->no_unlock_folio &&
+ if (folio == rreq->no_unlock_folio &&
test_bit(NETFS_RREQ_NO_UNLOCK_FOLIO, &rreq->flags)) {
_debug("no unlock");
} else {
--- a/fs/netfs/read_retry.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/read_retry.c
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ void netfs_unlock_abandoned_read_pages(s
struct folio *folio = folioq_folio(p, slot);
if (folio && !folioq_is_marked2(p, slot)) {
- if (folio->index == rreq->no_unlock_folio &&
+ if (folio == rreq->no_unlock_folio &&
test_bit(NETFS_RREQ_NO_UNLOCK_FOLIO,
&rreq->flags)) {
_debug("no unlock");
--- a/include/linux/netfs.h
+++ b/include/linux/netfs.h
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ struct netfs_io_request {
atomic64_t issued_to; /* Write issuer folio cursor */
unsigned long long collected_to; /* Point we've collected to */
unsigned long long cleaned_to; /* Position we've cleaned folios to */
- pgoff_t no_unlock_folio; /* Don't unlock this folio after read */
+ const struct folio *no_unlock_folio; /* Don't unlock this folio after read */
size_t prev_donated; /* Fallback for subreq->prev_donated */
refcount_t ref;
unsigned long flags;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from dhowells@redhat.com are
queue-6.12/netfs-fix-potential-uaf-in-netfs_unlock_abandoned_read_pages.patch
reply other threads:[~2026-08-24 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026082421-agility-reusable-88f1@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=demonaxsh@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pc@manguebit.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox