From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: dhowells@redhat.com,gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,mmirkin@nppct.ru,netfs@lists.linux.dev,pc@manguebit.org,sprasad@microsoft.com,stfrench@microsoft.com
Cc: <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "cifs: Fix handling of a beyond-EOF DIO/unbuffered read over SMB1" has been added to the 6.12-stable tree
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2026 10:41:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026100718-protrude-reassign-9d93@gregkh> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
cifs: Fix handling of a beyond-EOF DIO/unbuffered read over SMB1
to the 6.12-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
cifs-fix-handling-of-a-beyond-eof-dio-unbuffered-read-over-smb1.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.12 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
From 9d85ac939d52e93d80efb01a299c6f0bedb30487 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 16:24:53 +0000
Subject: cifs: Fix handling of a beyond-EOF DIO/unbuffered read over SMB1
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
commit 9d85ac939d52e93d80efb01a299c6f0bedb30487 upstream.
If a DIO read or an unbuffered read request extends beyond the EOF, the
server will return a short read and a status code indicating that EOF was
hit, which gets translated to -ENODATA. Note that the client does not cap
the request at i_size, but asks for the amount requested in case there's a
race on the server with a third party.
Now, on the client side, the request will get split into multiple
subrequests if rsize is smaller than the full request size. A subrequest
that starts before or at the EOF and returns short data up to the EOF will
be correctly handled, with the NETFS_SREQ_HIT_EOF flag being set,
indicating to netfslib that we can't read more.
If a subrequest, however, starts after the EOF and not at it, HIT_EOF will
not be flagged, its error will be set to -ENODATA and it will be abandoned.
This will cause the request as a whole to fail with -ENODATA.
Fix this by setting NETFS_SREQ_HIT_EOF on any subrequest that lies beyond
the EOF marker.
This can be reproduced by mounting with "cache=none,sign,vers=1.0" and
doing a read of a file that's significantly bigger than the size of the
file (e.g. attempting to read 64KiB from a 16KiB file).
Fixes: a68c74865f51 ("cifs: Fix SMB1 readv/writev callback in the same way as SMB2/3")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara (Red Hat) <pc@manguebit.org>
cc: Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@microsoft.com>
cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
[Mikhail Mirkin: Adopted for 6.12]
Signed-off-by: Mikhail Mirkin <mmirkin@nppct.ru>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/smb/client/cifssmb.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/smb/client/cifssmb.c
+++ b/fs/smb/client/cifssmb.c
@@ -1321,7 +1321,7 @@ cifs_readv_callback(struct mid_q_entry *
} else {
size_t trans = rdata->subreq.transferred + rdata->got_bytes;
if (trans < rdata->subreq.len &&
- rdata->subreq.start + trans == ictx->remote_i_size) {
+ rdata->subreq.start + trans >= ictx->remote_i_size) {
__set_bit(NETFS_SREQ_HIT_EOF, &rdata->subreq.flags);
rdata->result = 0;
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from dhowells@redhat.com are
queue-6.12/smb-client-discard-post-eof-pagecache-when-extending-a-file-via-copy-range.patch
queue-6.12/smb-client-discard-post-eof-pagecache-when-extending-a-file-via-zero-range.patch
queue-6.12/cifs-fix-handling-of-a-beyond-eof-dio-unbuffered-read-over-smb1.patch
queue-6.12/netfs-clear-post-eof-pagecache-when-extending-a-file.patch
reply other threads:[~2026-10-07 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026100718-protrude-reassign-9d93@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=mmirkin@nppct.ru \
--cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pc@manguebit.org \
--cc=sprasad@microsoft.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stfrench@microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox