From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
patches@lists.linux.dev, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
netfs@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.18 251/621] netfs: Fix zeropoint update where i_size > remote_i_size
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 13:34:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261013112926.818120005@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261013112920.855194808@linuxfoundation.org>
6.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit 4543a4d737944134a1394afe797622546fbcc98a ]
Fix the update of the zero point[*] by netfs_release_folio() when there is
uncommitted data in the pagecache beyond the folio being released but the
on-server EOF is in this folio (ie. i_size > remote_i_size). The update
needs to limit zero_point to remote_i_size, not i_size as i_size is a local
phenomenon reflecting updates made locally to the pagecache, not stuff
written to the server. remote_i_size tracks the server's i_size.
[*] The zero point is the file position from which we can assume that the
server will just return zeros, so we can avoid generating reads.
Note that netfs_invalidate_folio() probably doesn't need fixing as
zero_point should be updated by setattr after truncation or fallocate.
Found with:
fsx -q -N 1000000 -p 10000 -o 128000 -l 600000 \
/xfstest.test/junk --replay-ops=junk.fsxops
using the following as junk.fsxops:
truncate 0x0 0x1bbae 0x82864
write 0x3ef2e 0xf9c8 0x1bbae
write 0x67e05 0xcb5a 0x4e8f6
mapread 0x57781 0x85b6 0x7495f
copy_range 0x5d3d 0x10329 0x54fac 0x7495f
write 0x64710 0x1c2b 0x7495f
mapread 0x64000 0x1000 0x7495f
on cifs with the default cache option.
It shows read-gaps on folio 0x64 failing with a short read (ie. it hits
EOF) if the FMODE_READ check is commented out in netfs_perform_write():
if (//(file->f_mode & FMODE_READ) ||
netfs_is_cache_enabled(ctx)) {
and no fscache. This was initially found with the generic/522 xfstest.
Fixes: cce6bfa6ca0e ("netfs: Fix trimming of streaming-write folios in netfs_inval_folio()")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260512123404.719402-7-dhowells@redhat.com
cc: Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.org>
cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
fs/netfs/misc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/netfs/misc.c b/fs/netfs/misc.c
index 02654b5c53fe3..d8a67ea348f7f 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/misc.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/misc.c
@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ bool netfs_release_folio(struct folio *folio, gfp_t gfp)
if (folio_test_dirty(folio))
return false;
- end = umin(folio_pos(folio) + folio_size(folio), i_size_read(&ctx->inode));
+ end = umin(folio_pos(folio) + folio_size(folio), ctx->remote_i_size);
if (end > ctx->zero_point)
ctx->zero_point = end;
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-13 12:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20261013112920.855194808@linuxfoundation.org>
2026-10-13 11:33 ` [PATCH 6.18 243/621] netfs: Fix missing barriers when accessing stream->subrequests locklessly Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-10-13 11:34 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2026-10-13 11:35 ` [PATCH 6.18 327/621] netfs: Fix folio_queue ENOMEM in writeback by adding a mempool Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-10-13 11:40 ` [PATCH 6.18 606/621] netfs, afs: Fix symlink reading Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261013112926.818120005@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pc@manguebit.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox