From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
netfs@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] netfs: Advance iterator correctly rather than jumping it
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 09:08:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2238548.1727424522@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In netfs_write_folio(), use iov_iter_advance() to advance the folio as we
split bits of it off to subrequests rather than manually jumping the
->iov_offset value around. This becomes more problematic when we use a
bounce buffer made out of single-page folios to cover a multipage pagecache
folio.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
---
fs/netfs/write_issue.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/netfs/write_issue.c b/fs/netfs/write_issue.c
index 0929d9fd4ce7..6293f547e4c3 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/write_issue.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/write_issue.c
@@ -317,6 +317,7 @@ static int netfs_write_folio(struct netfs_io_request *wreq,
struct netfs_io_stream *stream;
struct netfs_group *fgroup; /* TODO: Use this with ceph */
struct netfs_folio *finfo;
+ size_t iter_off = 0;
size_t fsize = folio_size(folio), flen = fsize, foff = 0;
loff_t fpos = folio_pos(folio), i_size;
bool to_eof = false, streamw = false;
@@ -472,7 +473,12 @@ static int netfs_write_folio(struct netfs_io_request *wreq,
if (choose_s < 0)
break;
stream = &wreq->io_streams[choose_s];
- wreq->io_iter.iov_offset = stream->submit_off;
+
+ /* Advance the iterator(s). */
+ if (stream->submit_off > iter_off) {
+ iov_iter_advance(&wreq->io_iter, stream->submit_off - iter_off);
+ iter_off = stream->submit_off;
+ }
atomic64_set(&wreq->issued_to, fpos + stream->submit_off);
stream->submit_extendable_to = fsize - stream->submit_off;
@@ -487,8 +493,8 @@ static int netfs_write_folio(struct netfs_io_request *wreq,
debug = true;
}
- wreq->io_iter.iov_offset = 0;
- iov_iter_advance(&wreq->io_iter, fsize);
+ if (fsize > iter_off)
+ iov_iter_advance(&wreq->io_iter, fsize - iter_off);
atomic64_set(&wreq->issued_to, fpos + fsize);
if (!debug)
next reply other threads:[~2024-09-27 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-27 8:08 David Howells [this message]
2024-09-27 8:11 ` [PATCH] netfs: Advance iterator correctly rather than jumping it Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2238548.1727424522@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sfrench@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox