From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Nicolas Baranger <nicolas.baranger@3xo.fr>,
Paulo Alcantara (Red Hat) <pc@manguebit.com>,
Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
netfs@lists.linux.dev, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] netfs: Fix kernel async DIO
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2025 18:39:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <608725.1736275167@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
Netfslib needs to be able to handle kernel-initiated asynchronous DIO that
is supplied with a bio_vec[] array. Currently, because of the async flag,
this gets passed to netfs_extract_user_iter() which throws a warning and
fails because it only handles IOVEC and UBUF iterators. This can be
triggered through a combination of cifs and a loopback blockdev with
something like:
mount //my/cifs/share /foo
dd if=/dev/zero of=/foo/m0 bs=4K count=1K
losetup --sector-size 4096 --direct-io=on /dev/loop2046 /foo/m0
echo hello >/dev/loop2046
This causes the following to appear in syslog:
WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 109 at fs/netfs/iterator.c:50 netfs_extract_user_iter+0x170/0x250 [netfs]
and the write to fail.
Fix this by removing the check in netfs_unbuffered_write_iter_locked() that
causes async kernel DIO writes to be handled as userspace writes. Note
that this change relies on the kernel caller maintaining the existence of
the bio_vec array (or kvec[] or folio_queue) until the op is complete.
Fixes: 153a9961b551 ("netfs: Implement unbuffered/DIO write support")
Reported-by: Nicolas Baranger <nicolas.baranger@3xo.fr>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/fedd8a40d54b2969097ffa4507979858@3xo.fr/
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Nicolas Baranger <nicolas.baranger@3xo.fr>
Acked-by: Paulo Alcantara (Red Hat) <pc@manguebit.com>
cc: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
---
fs/netfs/direct_write.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/netfs/direct_write.c b/fs/netfs/direct_write.c
index 173e8b5e6a93..f9421f3e6d37 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/direct_write.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/direct_write.c
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ ssize_t netfs_unbuffered_write_iter_locked(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *
* allocate a sufficiently large bvec array and may shorten the
* request.
*/
- if (async || user_backed_iter(iter)) {
+ if (user_backed_iter(iter)) {
n = netfs_extract_user_iter(iter, len, &wreq->iter, 0);
if (n < 0) {
ret = n;
@@ -77,6 +77,11 @@ ssize_t netfs_unbuffered_write_iter_locked(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *
wreq->direct_bv_count = n;
wreq->direct_bv_unpin = iov_iter_extract_will_pin(iter);
} else {
+ /* If this is a kernel-generated async DIO request,
+ * assume that any resources the iterator points to
+ * (eg. a bio_vec array) will persist till the end of
+ * the op.
+ */
wreq->iter = *iter;
}
next reply other threads:[~2025-01-07 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-07 18:39 David Howells [this message]
2025-01-09 16:19 ` [PATCH] netfs: Fix kernel async DIO Christian Brauner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-01-01 18:00 Losetup Direct I/O breaks BACK-FILE filesystem on CIFS share (Appears in Linux 6.10 and reproduced on mainline) nicolas.baranger
[not found] ` <669f22fc89e45dd4e56d75876dc8f2bf@3xo.fr>
2025-01-06 11:37 ` [PATCH] netfs: Fix kernel async DIO David Howells
2025-01-06 12:07 ` nicolas.baranger
2025-01-07 8:26 ` nicolas.baranger
2025-01-07 14:49 ` David Howells
2025-01-07 18:08 ` Nicolas Baranger
2025-01-06 15:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 12:03 ` Paulo Alcantara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=608725.1736275167@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=nicolas.baranger@3xo.fr \
--cc=pc@manguebit.com \
--cc=smfrench@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).