From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, netfs@lists.linux.dev, jlayton@kernel.org,
hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com, jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com,
linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, brauner@kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
yangerkun@huawei.com, houtao1@huawei.com, yukuai3@huawei.com,
wozizhi@huawei.com, Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfs: Delete subtree of 'fs/netfs' when netfs module exits
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 11:37:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <952423.1724841455@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240826113404.3214786-1-libaokun@huaweicloud.com>
libaokun@huaweicloud.com wrote:
> In netfs_init() or fscache_proc_init(), we create dentry under 'fs/netfs',
> but in netfs_exit(), we only delete the proc entry of 'fs/netfs' without
> deleting its subtree. This triggers the following WARNING:
>
> ==================================================================
> remove_proc_entry: removing non-empty directory 'fs/netfs', leaking at least 'requests'
> WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 566 at fs/proc/generic.c:717 remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0
> Modules linked in: netfs(-)
> CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 566 Comm: rmmod Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3 #860
> RIP: 0010:remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> netfs_exit+0x12/0x620 [netfs]
> __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x14c/0x2e0
> do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x110
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
> ==================================================================
>
> Therefore use remove_proc_subtree instead() of remove_proc_entry() to
> fix the above problem.
>
> Fixes: 7eb5b3e3a0a5 ("netfs, fscache: Move /proc/fs/fscache to /proc/fs/netfs and put in a symlink")
> Cc: stable@kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Should remove_proc_entry() just remove the entire subtree anyway?
But you can add:
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-28 10:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-26 11:34 [PATCH] netfs: Delete subtree of 'fs/netfs' when netfs module exits libaokun
2024-08-28 10:37 ` David Howells [this message]
2024-08-28 12:11 ` Baokun Li
2024-08-28 11:22 ` Christian Brauner
2024-08-28 12:13 ` Baokun Li
2024-08-28 13:37 ` Christian Brauner
2024-08-28 13:42 ` Baokun Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=952423.1724841455@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=libaokun1@huawei.com \
--cc=libaokun@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=wozizhi@huawei.com \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox