From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/28] 53c700: improve non-coherent DMA handling Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 16:05:54 +0100 Message-ID: <20200901150554.GN14765@casper.infradead.org> References: <20200819065555.1802761-1-hch@lst.de> <20200819065555.1802761-8-hch@lst.de> <1598971960.4238.5.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1598971960.4238.5.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Sender: linux-ia64-owner@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Joonyoung Shim , Seung-Woo Kim , Kyungmin Park , Ben Skeggs , Pawel Osciak , Marek Szyprowski , Matt Porter , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Tom Lendacky , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, netdev@vger.ke List-Id: nouveau.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 07:52:40AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > I think this looks mostly OK, except for one misnamed parameter below. > Unfortunately, the last non-coherent parisc was the 700 series and I no > longer own a box, so I can't test that part of it (I can fire up the > C360 to test it on a coherent arch). I have a 715/50 that probably hasn't been powered on in 15 years if you need something that old to test on (I believe the 725/100 uses the 7100LC and so is coherent). I'll need to set up a cross-compiler ...