From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Bogendoerfer Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/18] 53c700: convert to dma_alloc_noncoherent Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:51:34 +0200 Message-ID: <20200922085134.GG8477@alpha.franken.de> References: <20200915155122.1768241-1-hch@lst.de> <20200915155122.1768241-14-hch@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200915155122.1768241-14-hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Sender: "iommu" To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: alsa-devel-K7yf7f+aM1XWsZ/bQMPhNw@public.gmane.org, linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, "James E.J. Bottomley" , linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, linux1394-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, linux-samsung-soc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Joonyoung Shim , linux-scsi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Ben Skeggs , Matt Porter , linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-parisc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Seung-Woo Kim , linux-mips-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, Stefan Richter List-Id: nouveau.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 05:51:17PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Use the new non-coherent DMA API including proper ownership transfers. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > --- > drivers/scsi/53c700.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) Tested-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]