nouveau.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>
To: "Rob Clark" <robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@redhat.com>,
	"Connor Abbott" <cwabbott0@gmail.com>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
	"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
	"Lyude Paul" <lyude@redhat.com>,
	"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:DRM DRIVER FOR NVIDIA GEFORCE/QUADRO GPUS"
	<nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] drm/gpuvm: Send in-place re-maps to the driver as remap
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2025 11:33:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DBUE2QU2CH9N.3C32KHT9LHMMB@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250804214317.658704-2-robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com>

(Cc: Thomas, Boris, Matt, Alice)

On Mon Aug 4, 2025 at 11:43 PM CEST, Rob Clark wrote:
> The 'keep' hint on the unmap is only half useful, without being able to
> link it to a map cb.  Instead combine the two ops into a remap op to
> give the driver a chance to figure things out.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c            | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c |  3 ++-
>  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c
> index bbc7fecb6f4a..e21782a97fbe 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c
> @@ -2125,6 +2125,27 @@ __drm_gpuvm_sm_map(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm,
>  				 offset == req_offset;
>  
>  			if (end == req_end) {
> +				if (merge) {
> +					/*
> +					 * This is an exact remap of the existing
> +					 * VA (potentially flags change)?  Pass
> +					 * this to the driver as a remap so it can
> +					 * do an in-place update:
> +					 */
> +					struct drm_gpuva_op_map n = {
> +						.va.addr = va->va.addr,
> +						.va.range = va->va.range,
> +						.gem.obj = va->gem.obj,
> +						.gem.offset = va->gem.offset,
> +					};
> +					struct drm_gpuva_op_unmap u = {
> +						.va = va,
> +						.keep = true,
> +					};
> +
> +					return op_remap_cb(ops, priv, NULL, &n, &u);
> +				}

I don't see why this is necessary, a struct drm_gpuva_op_unmap carries the
struct drm_gpuva to unmap. You can easily compare this to the original request
you gave to GPUVM, i.e. req_addr, req_range, req_obj, req_offset, etc.

Which is what you have to do for any other unmap operation that has keep == true
anyways, e.g. if D is the exact same as A, B and C.

	Cur
	---
	1                       N
	|---A---|---B---|---C---|
	
	Req
	---
	1                       N
	|-----------D-----------|

In this case you get three unmap ops with keep == true, which you can compare to
your request to figure out that you can keep the corresponding PTEs.

Besides that it changes the semantics that the documentation mentions and that
drivers are allowed to rely on, i.e. a struct drm_gpuva_op_remap represents
an actual change and any call to __drm_gpuvm_sm_map() results in an arbitrary
number of unmap ops, a maximum of two remap ops and exactly one map operation.

>  				ret = op_unmap_cb(ops, priv, va, merge);
>  				if (ret)
>  					return ret;

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-05  9:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-04 21:43 [PATCH RESEND 0/2] drm/gpuvm+msm: Handle in-place remaps Rob Clark
2025-08-04 21:43 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/2] drm/gpuvm: Send in-place re-maps to the driver as remap Rob Clark
2025-08-05  9:33   ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]
2025-08-05 14:32     ` Rob Clark
2025-08-05 14:48       ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-08-05 14:59         ` Rob Clark

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DBUE2QU2CH9N.3C32KHT9LHMMB@kernel.org \
    --to=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=cwabbott0@gmail.com \
    --cc=dakr@redhat.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lyude@redhat.com \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).