From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ@public.gmane.org Subject: [Bug 109952] nv106 nv108 confusion Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:47:35 +0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0532682003==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: nouveau-bounces-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org Sender: "Nouveau" To: nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org List-Id: nouveau.vger.kernel.org --===============0532682003== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="15523048550.6ED1e5A.8765" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --15523048550.6ED1e5A.8765 Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:47:35 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109952 --- Comment #1 from Ilia Mirkin --- Marketing names are fungible. If nouveau says it's a NV106, then it's a NV1= 06. If it's truly not, then the hw maker screwed up -- unlikely. Also GK208B is something we largely invented -- they're all marketed as GK208, but the "BO= OT0" register has a different chip id. You can reuse the same firmware files as nv108 for nv106 -- can just symlink them, ought to work. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= --15523048550.6ED1e5A.8765 Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:47:35 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated

Commen= t # 1 on bug 10995= 2 from Ilia Mirkin 
Marketing names are fungible. If nouveau says it's a NV106, th=
en it's a NV106.
If it's truly not, then the hw maker screwed up -- unlikely. Also GK208B is
something we largely invented -- they're all marketed as GK208, but the &qu=
ot;BOOT0"
register has a different chip id.

You can reuse the same firmware files as nv108 for nv106 -- can just symlink
them, ought to work.

You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are the assignee for the bug.
= --15523048550.6ED1e5A.8765-- --===============0532682003== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KTm91dmVhdSBt YWlsaW5nIGxpc3QKTm91dmVhdUBsaXN0cy5mcmVlZGVza3RvcC5vcmcKaHR0cHM6Ly9saXN0cy5m cmVlZGVza3RvcC5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9ub3V2ZWF1 --===============0532682003==--