NVIDIA GPU driver infrastructure
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>
To: "Alistair Popple" <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: <nova-gpu@lists.linux.dev>, "Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
	"Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@nvidia.com>,
	"Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>, "Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
	"Eliot Courtney" <ecourtney@nvidia.com>,
	"John Hubbard" <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] drm: nova: Add chipid enum to nova-drm UAPI
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 23:29:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DKAIVPSA45O9.1NZES5S3BII10@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <amhdA35CcMD_uY2f@nvdebian.thelocal>

On Tue Jul 28, 2026 at 10:00 AM CEST, Alistair Popple wrote:
> On 2026-07-26 at 01:23 +1000, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org> wrote...
>> On Thu Jul 23, 2026 at 8:30 AM CEST, Alistair Popple wrote:
>> > diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/nova_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/nova_drm.h
>> > index 3ca90ed9d2bb..cb13fba6b952 100644
>> > --- a/include/uapi/drm/nova_drm.h
>> > +++ b/include/uapi/drm/nova_drm.h
>> > @@ -25,6 +25,39 @@ extern "C" {
>> >   */
>> >  #define NOVA_GETPARAM_VRAM_BAR_SIZE	0x1
>> >  
>> > +enum drm_nova_chipid {
>> 
>> It seems trivial, but let's add at least some documentation.
>
> No, good idea.
>
>> For instance, what's valid for userspace to extract from this? Given chipid is a
>> composed value, is userspace e.g. allowed to make assumptions on extracting the
>> architecture? Or is this something we want to expose separately and tell
>> userspace that the chipid is an opaque value identifying a specific chip only?
>
> I _think_ it makes sense for this to just be an opaque value, but it's a good
> question that I should probably try and get some internal feedback on as well.
> Reading the arch would then be a separate parameter.

I'd prefer exposing it as an opaque value and provide other information
separately; the kernel already does the work anyway, so why duplicate it in
userspace. It would also remain much cleaner if encoding details ever change.

>> > +	/* Turing */
>> > +	NOVA_DRM_CHIPID_TU102 = 0x162,
>> > +	NOVA_DRM_CHIPID_TU104 = 0x164,
>> > +	NOVA_DRM_CHIPID_TU106 = 0x166,
>> > +	NOVA_DRM_CHIPID_TU117 = 0x167,
>> > +	NOVA_DRM_CHIPID_TU116 = 0x168,
>> > +	/* Ampere */
>> > +	NOVA_DRM_CHIPID_GA100 = 0x170,
>> > +	NOVA_DRM_CHIPID_GA102 = 0x172,
>> > +	NOVA_DRM_CHIPID_GA103 = 0x173,
>> > +	NOVA_DRM_CHIPID_GA104 = 0x174,
>> > +	NOVA_DRM_CHIPID_GA106 = 0x176,
>> > +	NOVA_DRM_CHIPID_GA107 = 0x177,
>> > +	/* Hopper */
>> > +	NOVA_DRM_CHIPID_GH100 = 0x180,
>> > +	/* Ada */
>> > +	NOVA_DRM_CHIPID_AD102 = 0x192,
>> > +	NOVA_DRM_CHIPID_AD103 = 0x193,
>> > +	NOVA_DRM_CHIPID_AD104 = 0x194,
>> > +	NOVA_DRM_CHIPID_AD106 = 0x196,
>> > +	NOVA_DRM_CHIPID_AD107 = 0x197,
>> > +	/* Blackwell GB10x */
>> > +	NOVA_DRM_CHIPID_GB100 = 0x1a0,
>> > +	NOVA_DRM_CHIPID_GB102 = 0x1a2,
>> > +	/* Blackwell GB20x */
>> > +	NOVA_DRM_CHIPID_GB202 = 0x1b2,
>> > +	NOVA_DRM_CHIPID_GB203 = 0x1b3,
>> > +	NOVA_DRM_CHIPID_GB205 = 0x1b5,
>> > +	NOVA_DRM_CHIPID_GB206 = 0x1b6,
>> > +	NOVA_DRM_CHIPID_GB207 = 0x1b7,
>> > +};


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-28 21:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-23  6:30 [PATCH v3 0/7] gpu: nova: Export parameters from nova-core to nova-drm Alistair Popple
2026-07-23  6:30 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] gpu: nova-core: Add public driver API to nova-core Alistair Popple
2026-07-25 15:23   ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-07-23  6:30 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] drm: nova: Add DRM registration data Alistair Popple
2026-07-25 15:23   ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-07-23  6:30 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] drm: nova: Add chipid enum to nova-drm UAPI Alistair Popple
2026-07-25 15:23   ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-07-28  8:00     ` Alistair Popple
2026-07-28 21:29       ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]
2026-07-28 21:49         ` John Hubbard
2026-07-28 22:57           ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-07-23  6:30 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] drm: nova: Add GETPARAM parameter to read the GPU chipid Alistair Popple
2026-07-25 15:23   ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-07-23  6:30 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] drm: nova: Add GETPARAM parameter to read usable VRAM size Alistair Popple
2026-07-23  6:30 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] drm: nova: Use nova-core to read VRAM_BAR_SIZE parameter Alistair Popple
2026-07-23  6:30 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] drm: nova: Expose a render node Alistair Popple

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DKAIVPSA45O9.1NZES5S3BII10@kernel.org \
    --to=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=acourbot@nvidia.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ecourtney@nvidia.com \
    --cc=gary@garyguo.net \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lossin@kernel.org \
    --cc=nova-gpu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox