From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53A593644A3; Wed, 2 Sep 2026 19:27:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788377226; cv=none; b=mGFvZVCKj23RLnbW+FCF10A2VajB6sYvLxaBBBo4+77/7Plow1F1q3RfMLL7OI1zEn+0W9KhmE+S4DzP/RG6T5O6/vts+5bJcmBafcHJhTS4DgaNkg4Zwa1UZTWz75H3bFuTmSUVALTKBbmdtfnvAofBB2YgOPbjXD2qFaLGtUA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788377226; c=relaxed/simple; bh=r4rjYwJZSJZ2c1QOwxHbimkxPShAVA5Eroly37WYSrk=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Cc:To:From:Subject: References:In-Reply-To; b=B3wpZ8ZdTLfFQa2ColmErgOju3kxGHnD8DBE+QwYAVayaabAgj8olEkaiSchFq/Xund/yrgs1jzYsaAsEzGfa8b2XChI9Edxp1UG8ccT5pZUP7dqoVGGwXLIqwrCuAoMsRab4kg9jw+/Q2J5fwpRNV8XG2kyjPanMi91JtWgGjk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Cfi1/dqU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Cfi1/dqU" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B1D9D1F000E9; Wed, 2 Sep 2026 19:26:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788377220; bh=r4rjYwJZSJZ2c1QOwxHbimkxPShAVA5Eroly37WYSrk=; h=Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=Cfi1/dqUVDDAJtAQJAyCb9d4b4/kZr2IjmF/z0TDxKyI3C/BDTKeSj7+QrqheDMah jjq9LxdKHP/wVhQje4L9wIrK8SojHh1rjjx+9GY90Ky3jp8i/ywJks6Wa+g32pzr5j 9GfMmM56OQ68Hw/sgVS9/X4da6cgaV+M6qTbETjdBwpoDnUVRrVK8L1T9/BOTRCLef J4+KrCNUUzgzPZL5LFGkzihQav6yADsaHuwbVb6pXdLSU+KFEMwyy9Xjj8UGfed79i NFV9CxbEuNkfWAgH8PBoT6BST4ztTVvfVJzsrk2y6BeFzL1ol4K+brNUTGZ8/BgrCQ 0d8ZRV1MwBJAA== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: nova-gpu@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 21:26:55 +0200 Message-Id: Cc: "Dave Airlie" , "nova-gpu" , "M Henning" , "Alice Ryhl" , "Alexandre Courbot" , "Benno Lossin" , "Gary Guo" , "Eliot Courtney" , "John Hubbard" , , , To: "Alistair Popple" From: "Danilo Krummrich" Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/11] drm: nova: Add an info ioctl References: <20260828033531.1117754-1-apopple@nvidia.com> <20260828033531.1117754-6-apopple@nvidia.com> In-Reply-To: On Wed Sep 2, 2026 at 9:05 AM CEST, Alistair Popple wrote: > On 2026-09-02 at 15:21 +1000, Alistair Popple wrote.= .. >> Ok, so just to double check are you happy with an accessor to return >> gsp_static_info as well? > > Still interested in your thoughts here though, just to avoid churn becaus= e I'll > probably pick the wrong answer :-) Yeah, exposing that for gpu_name() seems fine.