Re: [PATCH v2 03/31] gpu: nova-core: extract radix3 page table into its own module

["Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@nvidia.com>]

On Mon Sep 7, 2026 at 1:20 PM JST, John Hubbard wrote:
> On 9/6/26 8:13 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> On Sat Aug 22, 2026 at 10:54 AM JST, John Hubbard wrote:
>> <...>
>> I was contemplating merging this patch early as it is a reasonable
>> change on its own, but unfortunately these two introduced (and unused
>> for now) members prevent me from doing so. They are also not related to
>> moving the Radix3 code around. Can you introduce them when they are
>> actually used?
>
> Sure.
>
>> 
>> This would allow me to merge this one and patch 6 (which btw is
>> strangely not placed right after this one, with unrelated changes in
>> between) early and lighten the series a bit.
>> 
>> I think patch 11 can also go in early, but I refrained from picking it
>> up now to spare you a conflict upon rebasing this series. Ideally this
>> one would also have been at the beginning of the series.
>
> Don't worry about conflicts, because lately I can resolve those pretty
> much automatically, with today's tools.

I do worry because today's tools tend to introduce churn when they meet
a speedbump. :')

>
> Should I sent a separate 2-patch series, with this patch merged in with
> patch 6, and patch 11, then? I also would like this series to be
> shorter, of course.

A separate series would be the shortest course, I think we could merge
it quickly in this case.

Let's keep the move to a new module and zero-padding as separate patches
though, it makes the history cleaner.