From: "Allen Hubbe" <Allen.Hubbe@emc.com>
To: 'Dave Jiang' <dave.jiang@intel.com>, jdmason@kudzu.us
Cc: linux-ntb@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] NTB: allocate number transport entries depending on size of ring size
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 13:57:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000001d191c0$0ea3cfe0$2beb6fa0$@emc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <146013774604.52030.5227558679570366112.stgit@djiang5-desk3.ch.intel.com>
> From: Dave Jiang
>
> Currently we only allocate a fixed default number of descriptors for the tx
> and rx side. We should dynamically resize it to the number of descriptors
> resides in the transport rings. We should know the number of transmit
> descriptors at initializaiton. We will allocate the default number of
> descriptors for receive side and allocate additional ones when we know the
> actual max entries for receive.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Allen Hubbe <allen.hubbe@emc.com>
> ---
> drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c b/drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c
> index 2ef9d913..6db8c85 100644
> --- a/drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c
> +++ b/drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c
> @@ -153,6 +153,7 @@ struct ntb_transport_qp {
> unsigned int rx_index;
> unsigned int rx_max_entry;
> unsigned int rx_max_frame;
> + unsigned int rx_alloc_entry;
> dma_cookie_t last_cookie;
> struct tasklet_struct rxc_db_work;
>
> @@ -480,7 +481,9 @@ static ssize_t debugfs_read(struct file *filp, char __user *ubuf,
> size_t count,
> out_offset += snprintf(buf + out_offset, out_count - out_offset,
> "rx_index - \t%u\n", qp->rx_index);
> out_offset += snprintf(buf + out_offset, out_count - out_offset,
> - "rx_max_entry - \t%u\n\n", qp->rx_max_entry);
> + "rx_max_entry - \t%u\n", qp->rx_max_entry);
> + out_offset += snprintf(buf + out_offset, out_count - out_offset,
> + "rx_alloc_entry - \t%u\n\n", qp->rx_alloc_entry);
>
> out_offset += snprintf(buf + out_offset, out_count - out_offset,
> "tx_bytes - \t%llu\n", qp->tx_bytes);
> @@ -597,9 +600,12 @@ static int ntb_transport_setup_qp_mw(struct ntb_transport_ctx *nt,
> {
> struct ntb_transport_qp *qp = &nt->qp_vec[qp_num];
> struct ntb_transport_mw *mw;
> + struct ntb_dev *ndev = nt->ndev;
> + struct ntb_queue_entry *entry;
> unsigned int rx_size, num_qps_mw;
> unsigned int mw_num, mw_count, qp_count;
> unsigned int i;
> + int node;
>
> mw_count = nt->mw_count;
> qp_count = nt->qp_count;
> @@ -626,6 +632,23 @@ static int ntb_transport_setup_qp_mw(struct ntb_transport_ctx *nt,
> qp->rx_max_entry = rx_size / qp->rx_max_frame;
> qp->rx_index = 0;
>
> + /*
> + * Checking to see if we have more entries than the default.
> + * We should add additional entries if that is the case so we
> + * can be in sync with the transport frames.
> + */
> + node = dev_to_node(&ndev->dev);
> + for (i = qp->rx_alloc_entry; i < qp->rx_max_entry; i++) {
> + entry = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*entry), GFP_ATOMIC, node);
> + if (!entry)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + entry->qp = qp;
> + ntb_list_add(&qp->ntb_rx_q_lock, &entry->entry,
> + &qp->rx_free_q);
> + qp->rx_alloc_entry++;
> + }
> +
> qp->remote_rx_info->entry = qp->rx_max_entry - 1;
>
> /* setup the hdr offsets with 0's */
> @@ -1722,8 +1745,9 @@ ntb_transport_create_queue(void *data, struct device *client_dev,
> ntb_list_add(&qp->ntb_rx_q_lock, &entry->entry,
> &qp->rx_free_q);
> }
> + qp->rx_alloc_entry = NTB_QP_DEF_NUM_ENTRIES;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < NTB_QP_DEF_NUM_ENTRIES; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < qp->tx_max_entry; i++) {
> entry = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*entry), GFP_ATOMIC, node);
> if (!entry)
> goto err2;
> @@ -1744,6 +1768,7 @@ err2:
> while ((entry = ntb_list_rm(&qp->ntb_tx_free_q_lock, &qp->tx_free_q)))
> kfree(entry);
> err1:
> + qp->rx_alloc_entry = 0;
> while ((entry = ntb_list_rm(&qp->ntb_rx_q_lock, &qp->rx_free_q)))
> kfree(entry);
> if (qp->tx_dma_chan)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-08 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-08 17:49 [PATCH v3] NTB: allocate number transport entries depending on size of ring size Dave Jiang
2016-04-08 17:57 ` Allen Hubbe [this message]
2016-04-21 14:54 ` Jon Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000001d191c0$0ea3cfe0$2beb6fa0$@emc.com' \
--to=allen.hubbe@emc.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=jdmason@kudzu.us \
--cc=linux-ntb@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox