From: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
linux-ntb <linux-ntb@googlegroups.com>,
Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>,
Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>,
Allen Hubbe <allenbh@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: dma_alloc_coherent bug in latest ntb_tool changes
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 16:17:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0a9adce4-dd06-652d-19ae-72929fa386f6@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e4743cee-5c10-4e16-5b8a-2090db3f9791@deltatee.com>
On 06/07/2018 04:10 PM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I'm just running ntb_test on recent kernels with switchtec hardware and
> found that ntb_tool and ntb_perf no longer work. I get this kernel warning:
>
> [ 64.077406] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 2231 at
> ./include/linux/dma-mapping.h:516 tool_mw_trans_write+0x16d/0x332 [ntb_tool]
>
> Indicating that the dma_coherent mask is not set on the device. (Not
> sure how much testing that patch set got before it was merged upstream...)
>
> It seems one of the changes that slipped through is that it now
> allocates DMA memory using the NTB struct device instead of the PCI
> struct device that was used before the patchset.
>
> Seeing nothing in the NTB tree sets the coherent mask on the NTB device
> we get a warning and fail to allocate DMA-able memory.
>
> I'm not sure the proper fix here: should we be using the NTB device for
> DMA operations or roll back to using the PCI device? It seems cleaner to
> use the NTB device but then we at least have to set the coherent_mask to
> something sane (probably safe to set it to 64bits for NTB hardware).
> However, I'm not sure if, for all arches, DMA ops depend on anything in
> the device besides the mask.
>
> Logan
>
I seem to recall having this discussion previously but don't remember
the outcome. I still think we should be dealing with the PCI device when
it comes to hardware stuff like DMA since that is the actual device. The
NTB device is just a an abstract device to make it work with the NTB bus
isn't it?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-07 23:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-07 23:10 dma_alloc_coherent bug in latest ntb_tool changes Logan Gunthorpe
2018-06-07 23:17 ` Dave Jiang [this message]
2018-06-07 23:57 ` Serge Semin
2018-06-08 0:05 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-06-08 0:24 ` Serge Semin
2018-06-08 0:33 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-06-08 0:54 ` Serge Semin
2018-06-08 0:04 ` Serge Semin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0a9adce4-dd06-652d-19ae-72929fa386f6@intel.com \
--to=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=allenbh@gmail.com \
--cc=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
--cc=jdmason@kudzu.us \
--cc=linux-ntb@googlegroups.com \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox