From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from xes-mad.com (xes-mad.com. [216.165.139.218]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n126si1214522ita.1.2016.12.07.09.33.54 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 07 Dec 2016 09:33:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 11:33:51 -0600 (CST) From: Aaron Sierra Message-ID: <1763865308.471858.1481132031876.JavaMail.zimbra@xes-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <000101d2509b$f25511a0$d6ff34e0$@dell.com> References: <1503156503.754106.1481072956836.JavaMail.zimbra@xes-inc.com> <000001d2509b$2d829050$8887b0f0$@dell.com> <000101d2509b$f25511a0$d6ff34e0$@dell.com> Subject: Re: correct ntb_spad_count comment typo MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Allen Hubbe Cc: Jon Mason , Dave Jiang , linux-ntb , Jiri Kosina List-ID: ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Allen Hubbe" > Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2016 9:09:45 AM > From: Allen Hubbe >> From: Aaron Sierra >> > The comment for ntb_spad_count incorrectly referred to ntb_mw_count. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Aaron Sierra >> >> Acked-by: Allen Hubbe >> > > Actually, the commit subject line should include the subsystem name. > > "NTB: Correct ntb_spad_count comment typo" Allen, First of all, thanks for taking time to review my patch! This is the exact subject that I sent out: [PATCH] NTB: correct ntb_spad_count comment typo Hopefully, this is just a glitch between me and you. > > John might fix this after accepting the patch as is, but it would be easier if > you amend the commit and send v2 with a new subject line. > Can anyone else confirm or deny the need for a v2? -Aaron S.