Linux PCI Non-Transparent Bridge framework and drivers
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Koichiro Den" <den@valinux.co.jp>
Cc: ntb@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/14] NTB: ntb_transport: Abort link setup on QP MW allocation failure
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 04:40:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260910044024.F0F3A1F0089A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260910040836.3792333-14-den@valinux.co.jp>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Lockless access to `remote_rx_info` can lead to Use-After-Free during link down.
- [Critical] Pending TX transactions and DMA operations are not flushed on link down, causing data corruption across link sessions or PCIe AER faults.
- [High] Aborting link setup on error path `out1` leaves the remote peer with an initialized `VERSION` scratchpad, desynchronizing the link state and potentially causing PCIe AER faults.
--

commit a2ff2a79d68e6714fb4cb53e3787e5e3e60a479e
Author: Koichiro Den <den@valinux.co.jp>

NTB: ntb_transport: Abort link setup on QP MW allocation failure

This patch updates ntb_transport_link_work() to abort link setup if QP memory
window allocation fails. It ensures that the worker does not publish a QP with
only a partially initialized memory-window state.

Fixes: a754a8fcaf38 ("NTB: allocate number transport entries depending on size of ring size")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

> diff --git a/drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c b/drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c
> index 096be87e5ede9..c1e3a077c45ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c
> +++ b/drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c
> @@ -1152,7 +1152,9 @@ static void ntb_transport_link_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  	}
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < nt->qp_count; i++) {
> -		ntb_transport_setup_qp_mw(nt, i);
> +		rc = ntb_transport_setup_qp_mw(nt, i);
> +		if (rc)
> +			goto out1;

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does jumping to out1 here
leave the remote peer with an initialized VERSION scratchpad?

Earlier in ntb_transport_link_work(), readiness is signaled to the remote peer:

    ntb_peer_spad_write(ndev, PIDX, VERSION, NTB_TRANSPORT_VERSION);
    /* Query the remote side for its info */

If ntb_transport_setup_qp_mw() fails, the error path cleans up local
translations but returns immediately without rescinding the version scratchpad:

out1:
    for (i = 0; i < nt->mw_count; i++)
        ntb_free_mw(nt, i);

    /* if there's an actual failure, we should just bail */
    if (rc < 0)
        return;

Could this leave the peer stranded in an invalid 'up' state, transmitting
memory-mapped I/O that hits unconfigured BARs and generates PCIe AER faults?

>  		ntb_transport_setup_qp_peer_msi(nt, i);
>  	}
>  

[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can lockless access to remote_rx_info
lead to a use-after-free regression during link down?

The ntb_transport_tx_free_entry() function reads the pointer locklessly:

drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c:ntb_transport_tx_free_entry() {
    struct ntb_rx_info *remote_rx_info = READ_ONCE(qp->remote_rx_info);
    unsigned int head = qp->tx_index;
    unsigned int tail;

    if (!remote_rx_info)
        return 0;

    tail = remote_rx_info->entry;
    ...
}

When the link goes down, ntb_transport_link_cleanup() invokes ntb_free_mw()
to free the DMA memory window:

drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c:ntb_free_mw() {
    ...
    for (i = num_mw; i < nt->qp_count; i += nt->mw_count) {
        nt->qp_vec[i].rx_buff = NULL;
        WRITE_ONCE(nt->qp_vec[i].remote_rx_info, NULL);
    }

    ntb_mw_clear_trans(nt->ndev, PIDX, num_mw);
    dma_free_attrs(dma_dev, mw->alloc_size, mw->alloc_addr,
                   mw->original_dma_addr, DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS);
}

Since the memory is freed immediately without waiting for concurrent readers
or an RCU grace period, could a reader preempted after reading the non-NULL
pointer dereference it after it is freed?

[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but are pending TX transactions and DMA
operations properly flushed on link down?

When the link goes down, ntb_qp_link_cleanup() waits for RX to idle and resets
the QP state:

drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c:ntb_qp_link_cleanup() {
    ...
    while (!ntb_transport_rx_idle(qp))
        fsleep(1000);

    ntb_qp_link_down_reset(qp);
    ...
}

However, it does not appear to synchronize, wait for, or cancel the TX offload
thread. The background thread can continue processing old packets:

drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c:ntb_tx_memcpy_kthread() {
    ...
    list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &local_list, entry) {
        list_del(&entry->entry);
        offset = qp->tx_mw + qp->tx_max_frame * entry->tx_index;
        ntb_memcpy_tx_on_stack(entry, offset);
    ...
}

Could delayed transactions from the old session execute and copy their
payloads to the remote memory window at their old tx_index, potentially
causing data corruption on the remote peer or PCIe AER faults if the
remote memory window is unmapped?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260910040836.3792333-1-den@valinux.co.jp?part=13

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-10  4:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-10  4:08 [PATCH v2 00/14] NTB: ntb_transport: Miscellaneous fixes Koichiro Den
2026-09-10  4:08 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] NTB: ntb_transport: Remove the device debugfs directory Koichiro Den
2026-09-10  4:20   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-10 18:41   ` Frank Li
2026-09-10  4:08 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] NTB: ntb_transport: Start TX offload thread after queue setup Koichiro Den
2026-09-11 16:13   ` Frank Li
2026-09-10  4:08 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] NTB: ntb_transport: Avoid deadlock when cancelling link work Koichiro Den
2026-09-10  4:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 16:21   ` Frank Li
2026-09-11 17:41     ` Koichiro Den
2026-09-10  4:08 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] NTB: ntb_transport: Publish link state after QP setup Koichiro Den
2026-09-11 16:39   ` Frank Li
2026-09-10  4:08 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] NTB: ntb_transport: Avoid losing QP link-up requests Koichiro Den
2026-09-10  4:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 16:53   ` Frank Li
2026-09-11 18:04     ` Koichiro Den
2026-09-11 18:21       ` Koichiro Den
2026-09-12  3:20         ` Frank Li
2026-09-12 14:52           ` Koichiro Den
2026-09-10  4:08 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] NTB: ntb_transport: Clear link state before QP cleanup Koichiro Den
2026-09-10  4:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-10  4:08 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] NTB: ntb_transport: Stop QP work before freeing a queue Koichiro Den
2026-09-10  4:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-10  4:08 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] NTB: ntb_transport: Stop RX tasklet scheduling " Koichiro Den
2026-09-10  4:08 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] NTB: ntb_transport: Drain RX tasklets during link cleanup Koichiro Den
2026-09-10  4:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-10  4:08 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] NTB: ntb_transport: Wait for RX completions before resetting a QP Koichiro Den
2026-09-10  4:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-10  4:08 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] NTB: ntb_transport: Prepare remote RX info accesses for MW teardown Koichiro Den
2026-09-10  4:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-10  4:08 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] NTB: ntb_transport: Clear QP pointers when freeing an MW Koichiro Den
2026-09-10  4:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-10  4:08 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] NTB: ntb_transport: Abort link setup on QP MW allocation failure Koichiro Den
2026-09-10  4:40   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-10  4:08 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] NTB: ntb_transport: Remove clients before freeing transport resources Koichiro Den
2026-09-10  4:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-10  8:48     ` Koichiro Den
2026-09-11 15:49       ` Dave Jiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260910044024.F0F3A1F0089A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=den@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=ntb@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox