From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org. [103.22.144.67]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s13si269862pfs.2.2018.04.04.21.48.22 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 04 Apr 2018 21:48:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael Ellerman Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 0/9] Add io{read|write}64 to io-64-atomic headers In-Reply-To: <515f5c92-ac02-6e09-830e-46ea4d462652@deltatee.com> References: <20180327230834.5931-1-logang@deltatee.com> <87r2nvmf3b.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> <515f5c92-ac02-6e09-830e-46ea4d462652@deltatee.com> Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2018 14:48:18 +1000 Message-ID: <876056cl7x.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain To: Logan Gunthorpe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-ntb@googlegroups.com, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Andy Shevchenko , Horia =?utf-8?Q?Geant=C4=83?= List-ID: Logan Gunthorpe writes: > On 4/4/2018 4:38 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: ... >> eg. It looks like I could take the two powerpc patches on their own for >> 4.17, and then the rest could go via other trees? > > Yup! If you can take the powerpc patches I can keep trying to get the > rest in. They are largely independent and shouldn't really change > anything without the following patches. OK, I'll take those then. >> Is patch 1 stand alone? > > Essentially, yes, but patch 5 depends on it seeing it's changing the > same area and is trying to avoid creating the same kbuild warnings that > patch 1 suppresses. > >> The other option is to ask Andrew Morton to take it, as he often carries >> these cross-tree type series. > > Thanks for the tip! I'll copy him when I repost it after the merge window. Cool. If you want him to take it you should probably explicitly say so when you repost. cheers