From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <tglx@linutronix.de>
Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de. [193.142.43.55])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v191si273203lfa.9.2020.12.10.16.07.01
        for <linux-ntb@googlegroups.com>
        (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
        Thu, 10 Dec 2020 16:07:01 -0800 (PST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 27/30] xen/events: Only force affinity mask for percpu interrupts
In-Reply-To: <7f7af60f-567f-cdef-f8db-8062a44758ce@oracle.com>
References: <20201210192536.118432146@linutronix.de> <20201210194045.250321315@linutronix.de> <7f7af60f-567f-cdef-f8db-8062a44758ce@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 01:06:59 +0100
Message-ID: <87ft4di4t8.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, "James E.J.
 Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>, Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>, afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com>, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>, Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>, Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, Wambui Karuga <wambui.karugax@gmail.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>, Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>, Allen Hubbe <allenbh@gmail.com>, linux-ntb@googlegroups.com, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Karthikeyan Mitran <m.karthikeyan@mobiveil.co.in>, Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>, "David S.
 Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
List-ID: <linux-ntb.googlegroups.com>

On Thu, Dec 10 2020 at 18:20, boris ostrovsky wrote:
> On 12/10/20 2:26 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> All event channel setups bind the interrupt on CPU0 or the target CPU for
>> percpu interrupts and overwrite the affinity mask with the corresponding
>> cpumask. That does not make sense.
>>
>> The XEN implementation of irqchip::irq_set_affinity() already picks a
>> single target CPU out of the affinity mask and the actual target is stor=
ed
>> in the effective CPU mask, so destroying the user chosen affinity mask
>> which might contain more than one CPU is wrong.
>>
>> Change the implementation so that the channel is bound to CPU0 at the XEN
>> level and leave the affinity mask alone. At startup of the interrupt
>> affinity will be assigned out of the affinity mask and the XEN binding w=
ill
>> be updated.=20
>
> If that's the case then I wonder whether we need this call at all and
> instead bind at startup time.

I was wondering about that, but my knowledge about the Xen internal
requirements is pretty limited. The current set at least survived basic
testing by J=C3=BCrgen.

Thanks,

        tglx