From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ale.deltatee.com (ale.deltatee.com. [207.54.116.67]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 189si7896ybc.1.2019.06.13.08.46.59 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 13 Jun 2019 08:46:59 -0700 (PDT) References: <20190523223100.5526-1-logang@deltatee.com> <20190613133014.GE1572@kudzu.us> From: Logan Gunthorpe Message-ID: <985a41a9-80c2-7b60-da98-4ea92085319b@deltatee.com> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 09:46:44 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190613133014.GE1572@kudzu.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] Support using MSI interrupts in ntb_transport To: Jon Mason Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ntb@googlegroups.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Joerg Roedel , Bjorn Helgaas , Allen Hubbe , Dave Jiang , Serge Semin , Eric Pilmore List-ID: On 2019-06-13 7:30 a.m., Jon Mason wrote: > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 04:30:50PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: >> This is another resend as there has been no feedback since v4. >> Seems Jon has been MIA this past cycle so hopefully he appears on the >> list soon. >> >> I've addressed the feedback so far and rebased on the latest kernel >> and would like this to be considered for merging this cycle. >> >> The only outstanding issue I know of is that it still will not work >> with IDT hardware, but ntb_transport doesn't work with IDT hardware >> and there is still no sensible common infrastructure to support >> ntb_peer_mw_set_trans(). Thus, I decline to consider that complication >> in this patchset. However, I'll be happy to review work that adds this >> feature in the future. >> >> Also, as the port number and resource index stuff is a bit complicated, >> I made a quick out of tree test fixture to ensure it's correct[1]. As >> an excerise I also wrote some test code[2] using the upcomming KUnit >> feature. > > Sorry for the delay. The patch is now in the ntb-next branch. We've > missed window for 5.2, but it will be in the 5.3 pull request (barring > last minute comments). Thanks Jon! Logan