From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>
Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Allen Hubbe <allenbh@gmail.com>,
Alexander Fomichev <a.fomichev@yadro.com>,
ntb@lists.linux.dev, patches@lists.linux.dev,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ntb_perf: Fix 64-bit division on 32-bit architectures
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 08:47:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YvpqfDNIBqLbC0FA@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YvZeC2UDZFdfb71M@kudzu.us>
Hi Jon,
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 10:04:59AM -0400, Jon Mason wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 10:43:26AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > When compiling for a 32-bit architecture, such as arm, an error occurs
> > during modpost:
> >
> > ERROR: modpost: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [drivers/ntb/test/ntb_perf.ko] undefined!
> >
> > The tries member of struct perf_thread is u64 so a 64-bit division
> > helper is needed. Use div_u64_rem() to get the remainder of the division
> > so that it can be checked against zero.
> >
> > Fixes: dc150dfb081f ("ntb_perf: extend with burst latency measurement")
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/ntb/test/ntb_perf.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/ntb/test/ntb_perf.c b/drivers/ntb/test/ntb_perf.c
> > index 23e154bd41b9..4e05c7aa070d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/ntb/test/ntb_perf.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ntb/test/ntb_perf.c
> > @@ -1118,6 +1118,7 @@ static int perf_run_latency(struct perf_thread *pthr)
> > void __iomem *flt_dst, *bnd_dst;
> > void *flt_src;
> > u64 stop_at;
> > + u32 rem;
> > int ret;
> >
> > pthr->tries = 0;
> > @@ -1146,7 +1147,8 @@ static int perf_run_latency(struct perf_thread *pthr)
> > }
> >
> > /* Avoid processor soft lock-ups */
> > - if (!(pthr->tries % RESCHEDULE_RATIO))
> > + div_u64_rem(pthr->tries, RESCHEDULE_RATIO, &rem);
> > + if (!rem)
> > schedule();
> > }
> >
> >
> > base-commit: 0c4b285d9636cc850f55151fa6a250dd131e5192
> > --
> > 2.37.0.rc1
> >
>
> Sorry for the extremely long delay in response. This patch is in my
> ntb branch and will be in my pull request for v5.20 which should be
> going out later today.
No worries, we all get busy :)
For the record, I believe this was addressed by Max's patch [1], which I
did see in -next for a time. It doesn't matter to me which one goes in,
just so long as the build doesn't break :)
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/20220627155710.2067032-1-jcmvbkbc@gmail.com/
Cheers,
Nathan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-15 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-22 17:43 [PATCH] ntb_perf: Fix 64-bit division on 32-bit architectures Nathan Chancellor
2022-08-12 14:04 ` Jon Mason
2022-08-15 15:47 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YvpqfDNIBqLbC0FA@dev-arch.thelio-3990X \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=a.fomichev@yadro.com \
--cc=allenbh@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=jdmason@kudzu.us \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=ntb@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox