From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1D7B2C81 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 17:49:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 67F2A68BFE; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 19:49:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 19:49:01 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jens Axboe Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Coly Li , Mike Snitzer , Song Liu , David Sterba , Josef Bacik , Theodore Ts'o , OGAWA Hirofumi , Dave Kleikamp , Ryusuke Konishi , Anton Altaparmakov , Konstantin Komarov , Kees Cook , Phillip Lougher , Jan Kara , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net, ntfs3@lists.linux.dev, reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: don't use ->bd_inode to access the block device size v3 Message-ID: <20211018174901.GA3990@lst.de> References: <20211018101130.1838532-1-hch@lst.de> <4a8c3a39-9cd3-5b2f-6d0f-a16e689755e6@kernel.dk> <20211018171843.GA3338@lst.de> <2f5dcf79-8419-45ff-c27c-68d43242ccfe@kernel.dk> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ntfs3@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2f5dcf79-8419-45ff-c27c-68d43242ccfe@kernel.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:40:51AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > static inline loff_t bdev_nr_bytes(struct block_device *bdev) > { > - return i_size_read(bdev->bd_inode); > + return bdev->bd_nr_sectors; This hunk needs to go into bdev_nr_sectors, and the bdev_nr_bytes probably wants to call bdev_nr_sectors and do the shifting.