From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-lf1-f51.google.com (mail-lf1-f51.google.com [209.85.167.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F38F4BA94 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 10:11:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.167.51 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713175893; cv=none; b=tWo1zpBdGHdkobYSvUqzAagZmKVKNaddjSRicg8mfFLGjoYWhNOyTIPrm3jSBzg76bxZdLq9RXqPKbDPZBZ7wlY7mRUl9+8l28/mIRO8f/516VS0tMtlVU5L+H/GgjnGUdM8/0gjJ4wQn96qAIDV4fhYjOHkgjd5k9nm9iFYgQ8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713175893; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2DDZl8UUeWOs0O3IafbxfGYFlPFUImGS37wNa+t/vKs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=UHchiOU58Rhfja5XAAMl7Jyr4vsHVi7e9Z+Wgi8YYHkgrE4cQanOVsyJVa0t6IlVwnpz4xBTsQljPUT93z2i6NBiajkT687S3MaE/83BjgJaKDEpHDCibNNIJH+wwTAyL7KZDBe6LoNrd6XXdeNcqIOAC72DIDJmEgbCAMa3DQo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=GbxVqaB4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.167.51 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="GbxVqaB4" Received: by mail-lf1-f51.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-516d3a470d5so3408296e87.3 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 03:11:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1713175889; x=1713780689; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=K53KJ//rPxptIYEyIbHsQ3Y8z2G87LDrSlP39lj6Obk=; b=GbxVqaB47vRUqrvCTf2k12cPNYutz1+STpjPuXk9guJhypiQy+H1S1FnX+eL1APle3 9cCqsmZMJ91Aw1WnTqMeH74KUcOTHSNpypIQyI10p6J8KBaVFTgbzE4kzRb5apv94Q8G 9Bqkq8jN5NvopmplDntATYygyDUedj0dkh3Jt3gG++3gZYYF/xO5XrXPnWp0Z3jQvDOO KNUJV2Y2Ni67ukAierdvjgsJ0uliqCETuYGNFrAHqb0vHzHZj0LzKsOLWOURKt+SRyVv 32PtRvBim9gTukIwHO8JCVTXHYVUPV+Xbm8CgM6XgT5uTSkVC9kE9l9V6APo7a0vhrkC IMIA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1713175889; x=1713780689; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=K53KJ//rPxptIYEyIbHsQ3Y8z2G87LDrSlP39lj6Obk=; b=t9nvFuLIg/YeqLScjlLo8vy85RowXM3vJkXPh9awFUQIa95zoLiLuJBFS/RMoAMr2V 4KFtPeUWow4J6E/ASq7kJ7aop2nSFy3MS0OM+CYaF5Yno86ILRKctwAxuTzVeGxsnm9Y 3D+w20XjxBspuE8zuZzS28OFqRpoL7+Rj37XxPYVrIRfQ8TAJdSdoRI4B6e4VXMAh32v SNrxKx5CF9fNPmFnBnn350TfRQwgorXGUbfBBMfZS0Ox+xvdwVEHvxEiZ9i1fjONB69n DBFNNGbQ49LvHn+C+kQy/Y0xfk/sqkn9W4veSePy8jA28glt7Nt003Cu3kUOib8VqAHU YzAQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVbNBIEWTWWYmLMcZ1j/eBnCj+BywMhRaIa7R+WEiuWBw1oEKkZeyhxe+WXOpzyoed+KZvMMf4O9FGsyB8NdQcCFDSBPPs= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwOkj+nTtPCAYnD5vqHFwQ00ub+ppR4mFmn8FZVV6s9yLA5M0GJ 1FuqQNRGWdzx4bfuHmIL5pFAuSkb+kC8dK2/vgHdFw/A4a1M6CH/ X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IET8/cx1av7sdk6r7Ui6m+fzYQPa+bAVk+uydHbdLlOH1XA/SsIOrmk3Bu0IMWMKFDxxEpU3g== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4e0d:0:b0:518:9362:f63 with SMTP id e13-20020ac24e0d000000b0051893620f63mr7395686lfr.0.1713175888461; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 03:11:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rivendell ([2a01:4f9:c010:5d73::1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 8-20020ac24828000000b00516c7676b97sm1222347lft.66.2024.04.15.03.11.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 15 Apr 2024 03:11:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 12:11:26 +0200 From: Enrico Mioso To: "Artem S. Tashkinov" Cc: Konstantin Komarov , ntfs3@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: NTFS driver excessive logging by default: Correct links count Message-ID: References: <6215a88a-7d78-4abb-911f-8a3e7033da3e@gmx.com> <32a9b58b-9781-4fb5-af86-3ba96041f85f@paragon-software.com> <48b67a18-878a-4068-bf3d-bc76960ecc59@gmx.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ntfs3@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48b67a18-878a-4068-bf3d-bc76960ecc59@gmx.com> On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 01:01:21PM +0000, Artem S. Tashkinov wrote: > > > On 4/11/24 11:00, Konstantin Komarov wrote: > > On 27.03.2024 13:28, Artem S. Tashkinov wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I hoped 6.8.2 would have the issue fixed but no luck. > > > > > > Whenever I list files on my NTFS partitions I get a lot of SPAM in > > > dmesg, e.g.: > > > > > > ntfs3: sda3: ino=14c, Correct links count -> 1. > > > ntfs3: sda3: ino=73, Correct links count -> 1. > > > ntfs3: sda3: ino=167, Correct links count -> 1. > > > ntfs3: sda3: ino=d9, Correct links count -> 1. > > > ntfs3: sda3: ino=d5, Correct links count -> 1. > > > > > > And the partition in question has been fully chkdsk'ed and has no issues. > > > > > > Please fix. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Artem > > > > Hello Artem, > > > > Probably your volume contains non-critical (minor) errors. > > chkdsk does not show them, but fixes them if you specify /f. > > > > I have run chkdsk /f twice and I'm still getting these errors: > > ntfs3: sda7: ino=14c, Correct links count -> 1. > ntfs3: sda7: ino=73, Correct links count -> 1. > ntfs3: sda7: ino=d9, Correct links count -> 1. > ntfs3: sda7: ino=98, Correct links count -> 1. > ntfs3: sda7: ino=d5, Correct links count -> 1. > ntfs3: sda7: ino=f2, Correct links count -> 1. > ntfs3: sda7: ino=e1, Correct links count -> 1. > ntfs3: sda7: ino=e8, Correct links count -> 1. > ntfs3: sda7: ino=e5, Correct links count -> 1. > ntfs3: sda7: ino=e4, Correct links count -> 1. > > 1. It's a bug You are probably right, but let's make it explicit: you're assuming no bugs can be present in chkdsk.exe. > 2. Even if it's not a bug (I'm 100% sure there is one since chkdsk does > not fix it), there must be a single message per partition per boot at most. I might be wrong, but I see different ino values, so limiting the messages at one per boot wouldn't probably make much sense or am I mistaken? Thanks, Enrico > > Regards, > Artem >