Re: [PATCH 2/2] ntfs3: remove warning

Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-04-04T08:06:10Z

On 25.03.24 13:05, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 11:12:00AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 09:34:38AM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
>>> This causes visible changes for users that rely on ntfs3 to serve as an
>>> alternative for the legacy ntfs driver. Print statements such as this
>>> should probably be made conditional on a debug config option or similar.
>>>
>>> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>
>>> Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Zf2zPf5TO5oYt3I3@hovoldconsulting.com
>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
>>
>> Tested-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
>>
>> I also see a
>>
>> ntfs3: Max link count 4000
>>
>> message on mount which wasn't there with NTFS legacy. Is that benign
>> and should be suppressed too perhaps?
>
> We need a reply from the ntfs3 maintainers here.

Those are known for taken their time to respond -- like we see here, as
nothing happened for 10 days now. Which makes we wonder: should we at
least bring the first patch from this series onto the track towards
mainline?

FWIW, quick side note: just noticed there was another report about the
"Correct links count -> 1." messages:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/6215a88a-7d78-4abb-911f-8a3e7033da3e@gmx.com/

Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.

#regzbot duplicate:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/6215a88a-7d78-4abb-911f-8a3e7033da3e@gmx.com/
#regzbot poke