NVDIMM Device and Persistent Memory development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Cheng <icheng@nvidia.com>
To: dave@stgolabs.net, jic23@kernel.org, dave.jiang@intel.com,
	alison.schofield@intel.com, vishal.l.verma@intel.com,
	djbw@kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: iweiny@kernel.org, ming.li@zohomail.com, gourry@gourry.net,
	rrichter@amd.com, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, newtonl@nvidia.com,
	kristinc@nvidia.com, kaihengf@nvidia.com, kobak@nvidia.com,
	mochs@nvidia.com, Richard Cheng <icheng@nvidia.com>
Subject: [ndctl PATCH v2] test/fwctl: Add Feature OOB rejection regression tests
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 14:21:22 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260721062122.24138-1-icheng@nvidia.com> (raw)

Add negative cases for the CXL fwctl Get Feature and Set Feature output
buffer bounds checks.

For Get Feature, request a non-zero payload while providing room only
for the fwctl_rpc_cxl_out header. Verify that the kernel rejects the
request with -EINVAL instead of writing past the rpc_out buffer.

For Set Feature, build a valid request and set out_len to zero. Verify
that the kernel rejects it with -EINVAL. Without the bounds check,
kvzalloc(0) returns ZERO_SIZE_PTR and the output header write can oops
the kernel.

Both cases depend on fixes [1]. Gate the tests on the running kernel
version so older kernels skip the unsafe requests rather than failing
the fwctl test.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260624134737.49166-1-icheng@nvidia.com/
Signed-off-by: Richard Cheng <icheng@nvidia.com>
---
Changelog:

v1->v2:
    - Gate the fix-dependent regression cases on kernel v7.3
    - Add Set Feature out_len == 0 rejection coverage
    - Group both cases behind one local kernel-version check

Best regards,
Richard Cheng.
---
 test/fwctl.c | 144 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 144 insertions(+)

diff --git a/test/fwctl.c b/test/fwctl.c
index 979c1a6..fb0d1da 100644
--- a/test/fwctl.c
+++ b/test/fwctl.c
@@ -5,10 +5,13 @@
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include <endian.h>
 #include <stdint.h>
+#include <stddef.h>
+#include <stdbool.h>
 #include <stdlib.h>
 #include <syslog.h>
 #include <string.h>
 #include <unistd.h>
+#include <sys/utsname.h>
 #include <sys/ioctl.h>
 #include <cxl/libcxl.h>
 #include <linux/uuid.h>
@@ -20,6 +23,35 @@
 
 static const char provider[] = "cxl_test";
 
+/* Running kernel version parsed once in main(). */
+static unsigned int kver_major;
+static unsigned int kver_minor;
+
+/*
+ * kver_ge - Whether the running kernel at least major.minor
+ *
+ * Test cases for fixes tied to a specific kver gate here so that they quietly
+ * skip rather than fail on kernels that predate the fix.
+ */
+static bool kver_ge(unsigned int major, unsigned int minor)
+{
+	if (kver_major != major)
+		return kver_major > major;
+	return kver_minor >= minor;
+}
+
+static void parse_kver(void)
+{
+	struct utsname uts;
+
+	if (uname(&uts) == 0 &&
+	    sscanf(uts.release, "%u.%u", &kver_major, &kver_minor) == 2)
+		return;
+
+	kver_major = 0;
+	kver_minor = 0;
+}
+
 UUID_DEFINE(test_uuid,
 	    0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff,
 	    0xff, 0xff,
@@ -207,6 +239,45 @@ out:
 	return rc;
 }
 
+static int cxl_fwctl_rpc_get_feature_oob(int fd, struct test_feature *feat_ctx)
+{
+	struct cxl_mbox_get_feat_in *feat_in;
+	struct fwctl_rpc_cxl_out *out;
+	size_t out_size, in_size;
+	struct fwctl_rpc_cxl *in;
+	struct fwctl_rpc *rpc;
+	int rc;
+
+	in_size = sizeof(*in) + sizeof(*feat_in);
+	/* header only => zero payload room */
+	out_size = offsetof(struct fwctl_rpc_cxl_out, payload);
+
+	rpc = get_prepped_command(in_size, out_size,
+				  CXL_MBOX_OPCODE_GET_FEATURE);
+	if (!rpc)
+		return -ENXIO;
+
+	in = (struct fwctl_rpc_cxl *)rpc->in;
+	out = (struct fwctl_rpc_cxl_out *)rpc->out;
+
+	feat_in = &in->get_feat_in;
+	uuid_copy(feat_in->uuid, feat_ctx->uuid);
+	/* non-zero count that exceeds the zero payload room */
+	feat_in->count = feat_ctx->get_size;
+
+	rc = send_command(fd, rpc, out);
+	free_rpc(rpc);
+
+	if (rc == -EINVAL)
+		return 0;
+	if (rc == 0) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "Get Feature with undersized out_len was not rejected\n");
+		return -ENXIO;
+	}
+	fprintf(stderr, "Get Feature OOB rejection test: unexpected rc %d\n", rc);
+	return rc;
+}
+
 static int cxl_fwctl_rpc_set_test_feature(int fd, struct test_feature *feat_ctx)
 {
 	struct cxl_mbox_set_feat_in *feat_in;
@@ -249,6 +320,73 @@ out:
 	return rc;
 }
 
+static int cxl_fwctl_rpc_set_feature_oob(int fd, struct test_feature *feat_ctx)
+{
+	struct cxl_mbox_set_feat_in *feat_in;
+	struct fwctl_rpc_cxl_out *out;
+	size_t in_size, out_size;
+	struct fwctl_rpc_cxl *in;
+	struct fwctl_rpc *rpc;
+	uint32_t val;
+	void *data;
+	int rc;
+
+	in_size = sizeof(*in) + sizeof(*feat_in) + sizeof(val);
+	out_size = sizeof(*out) + sizeof(val);
+	rpc = get_prepped_command(in_size, out_size,
+				  CXL_MBOX_OPCODE_SET_FEATURE);
+	if (!rpc)
+		return -ENXIO;
+
+	in = (struct fwctl_rpc_cxl *)rpc->in;
+	out = (struct fwctl_rpc_cxl_out *)rpc->out;
+	feat_in = &in->set_feat_in;
+	uuid_copy(feat_in->uuid, feat_ctx->uuid);
+	data = feat_in->feat_data;
+	val = DEFAULT_TEST_DATA2;
+	*(uint32_t *)data = htole32(val);
+	feat_in->flags = CXL_SET_FEAT_FLAG_FULL_DATA_TRANSFER;
+
+	/* A valid Set Feature request with no room for the output header */
+	rpc->out_len = 0;
+	rc = send_command(fd, rpc, out);
+	free_rpc(rpc);
+
+	if (rc == -EINVAL)
+		return 0;
+	if (rc == 0) {
+		fprintf(stderr,
+			"Set Feature with zero out_len was not rejected\n");
+		return -ENXIO;
+	}
+	fprintf(stderr,
+		"Set Feature OOB rejection test: unexpected rc %d\n", rc);
+	return rc;
+}
+
+static int cxl_fwctl_rpc_feature_oob_tests(int fd,
+					   struct test_feature *feat_ctx)
+{
+	int rc;
+
+	if (!kver_ge(7, 3)) {
+		fprintf(stderr,
+			"skip: Feature OOB rejection tests need kernel >= 7.3\n");
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	rc = cxl_fwctl_rpc_get_feature_oob(fd, feat_ctx);
+	if (rc) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "Failed Get Feature OOB rejection test: %d\n", rc);
+		return rc;
+	}
+
+	rc = cxl_fwctl_rpc_set_feature_oob(fd, feat_ctx);
+	if (rc)
+		fprintf(stderr, "Failed Set Feature OOB rejection test: %d\n", rc);
+	return rc;
+}
+
 static int cxl_fwctl_rpc_get_supported_features(int fd, struct test_feature *feat_ctx)
 {
 	struct cxl_mbox_get_sup_feats_out *feat_out;
@@ -393,6 +531,10 @@ static int test_fwctl_features(struct cxl_memdev *memdev)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
+	rc = cxl_fwctl_rpc_feature_oob_tests(fd, &feat_ctx);
+	if (rc)
+		goto out;
+
 out:
 	close(fd);
 	return rc;
@@ -417,6 +559,8 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 	struct cxl_bus *bus;
 	int rc;
 
+	parse_kver();
+
 	rc = cxl_new(&ctx);
 	if (rc < 0)
 		return rc;
-- 
2.43.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-07-21  6:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-21  6:21 Richard Cheng [this message]
2026-07-22  0:19 ` [ndctl PATCH v2] test/fwctl: Add Feature OOB rejection regression tests Alison Schofield

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260721062122.24138-1-icheng@nvidia.com \
    --to=icheng@nvidia.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=djbw@kernel.org \
    --cc=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=iweiny@kernel.org \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=kaihengf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kobak@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kristinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
    --cc=mochs@nvidia.com \
    --cc=newtonl@nvidia.com \
    --cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=rrichter@amd.com \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox