From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "John Groves" <john@jagalactic.com>
Cc: nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V12 11/12] famfs: Report device capacity via statfs so df works
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2026 02:58:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260803025840.E72C41F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0100019fc57500f5-06c293c8-393c-44e3-ad42-d4f4de58245d-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The `used_capacity` counter is permanently leaked when mapped files are unlinked or their inodes are evicted.
- [High] dax_fsdev_size() accesses the private dev_dax structure without holding the required dax_read_lock(), leading to a use-after-free race condition with concurrent device unbinds.
- [High] Missing read memory barrier when locklessly checking `daxdev->valid` allows reading an uninitialized or stale `daxdev->devp` pointer.
- [Low] famfs_file_init_dax() mixes goto-based error handling with scope-based cleanup helpers, violating the subsystem rules.
--
--- Patch [11]: [PATCH V12 11/12] famfs: Report device capacity via statfs so df works ---
commit 72bb530cad0a65ccec5c1eea93f055e5015f64ec
Author: John Groves <John@Groves.net>
famfs: Report device capacity via statfs so df works
Replace simple_statfs(), which reports zero blocks (so df omits the mount),
with famfs_statfs() reporting real capacity and usage.
Add dax_fsdev_size() in drivers/dax/fsdev.c, returning the size fsdev
caches at probe (dev_dax->cached_size - the sum of the device's ranges,
stable while bound), exported. It lives in fsdev.c because cached_size is
set only by the fsdev driver, and famfs only ever holds fsdev-mode daxdevs
(fs_dax_get() enforces DAXDRV_FSDEV_TYPE); famfs.ko therefore depends on
fsdev_dax.ko.
famfs tracks two byte counters under a new stats_sem:
- total_capacity: summed in famfs_install_daxdev() from dax_fsdev_size(),
covering the mount primary and every DAXDEV_OPEN secondary, counted once
per daxdev (on the valid 0->1 transition).
- used_capacity: summed in famfs_file_init_dax() from the fmap's mapped
device bytes (superblock + log + data files).
famfs_statfs() reports total and free (total - used). Free is an
approximation of the userspace allocator's free space (it ignores allocator
gaps and reserved regions), which is adequate for df.
(Side note: I am the maintainer of drivers/dax/fsdev.c)
Signed-off-by: John Groves <john@groves.net>
> diff --git a/drivers/dax/fsdev.c b/drivers/dax/fsdev.c
> index 188b2526bee45..a5b4b2d794286 100644
> --- a/drivers/dax/fsdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/dax/fsdev.c
> @@ -104,6 +104,25 @@ static size_t fsdev_dax_recovery_write(struct dax_device *dax_dev, pgoff_t pgoff
> return _copy_from_iter_flushcache(addr, bytes, i);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * dax_fsdev_size() - total size in bytes of an fsdev dax device
> + * @dax_dev: the dax device (must be bound to this driver)
> + *
> + * Returns the size cached at probe time (sum of all ranges); it cannot change
> + * while the driver is bound. Only valid for fsdev dax devices - callers
> + * ensure that (e.g. fs_dax_get() enforces DAXDRV_FSDEV_TYPE). Returns 0 if the
> + * device is not alive.
> + */
> +u64 dax_fsdev_size(struct dax_device *dax_dev)
> +{
> + struct dev_dax *dev_dax = dax_get_private(dax_dev);
> +
> + if (!dev_dax)
> + return 0;
> + return dev_dax->cached_size;
> +}
[Severity: High]
Does dax_get_private() require holding the dax_read_lock() here?
In the DAX subsystem, accessing dev_dax from a dax_device requires holding the
SRCU-based dax_read_lock(), because a concurrent driver unbind can call
kill_dax(), which clears DAXDEV_ALIVE, calls synchronize_srcu(&dax_srcu), and
frees the dev_dax structure.
Since dax_fsdev_size() and its caller famfs_install_daxdev() do not hold
dax_read_lock(), could a concurrent unbind result in dev_dax being freed
before dev_dax->cached_size is dereferenced?
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dax_fsdev_size);
> +
> static const struct dax_operations dev_dax_ops = {
> diff --git a/fs/famfs/famfs_file.c b/fs/famfs/famfs_file.c
> index abf049b32a4b9..5be39d6770899 100644
> --- a/fs/famfs/famfs_file.c
> +++ b/fs/famfs/famfs_file.c
> @@ -280,6 +280,11 @@ famfs_file_init_dax(struct file *file, void __user *arg)
> }
> inode_unlock(inode);
>
> + /* Account the mapped device bytes for statfs (only on success) */
> + if (!rc) {
> + scoped_guard(rwsem_write, &fsi->stats_sem)
> + fsi->used_capacity += extent_total;
[Severity: High]
Is fsi->used_capacity ever decremented when files are unlinked?
If famfs_file_init_dax() increments fsi->used_capacity here, should there be a
matching decrement path when the mapping is torn down and its private metadata
is freed in famfs_evict_inode()?
If FAMFS_OPT_UNLINK is enabled via ioctl, userspace could repeatedly create,
map, and delete files, causing used_capacity to monotonically grow until it
exceeds total_capacity. Would this permanently break the statfs free space
accounting for the mount?
> + }
> out:
> kvfree(fmap_buf);
> if (meta)
> famfs_meta_free(meta);
[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, but does this code mix goto-based error handling with
scope-based cleanup helpers?
Using the out label for manual cleanup (freeing fmap_buf and meta) while also
using scoped_guard() in the same function violates the documented cleanup
guidelines, which state that functions must not mix goto-based cleanup labels
and __free()/guard() declarations.
> diff --git a/fs/famfs/famfs_inode.c b/fs/famfs/famfs_inode.c
> index 6cbd7d657fd80..3c0d1094d6532 100644
> --- a/fs/famfs/famfs_inode.c
> +++ b/fs/famfs/famfs_inode.c
> @@ -462,6 +493,15 @@ int famfs_install_daxdev(
>
> wmb(); /* All other fields must be visible before valid */
> daxdev->valid = 1;
> + devp = daxdev->devp;
> + }
[Severity: High]
Is there a matching read memory barrier on the consumer side?
Here the producer uses wmb() before setting daxdev->valid = 1 to make the new
devp visible.
On the IO/fault path, famfs_daxdev_from_index() calls famfs_dax_err() to
locklessly read dd->valid, and if true, proceeds to read dd->devp:
fs/famfs/famfs_file.c:famfs_dax_err() {
if (!dd->valid) {
...
}
fs/famfs/famfs_file.c:famfs_daxdev_from_index() {
...
*errp = 0;
return dd->devp;
}
If there is no paired read memory barrier (e.g., smp_rmb() or
smp_load_acquire()) on the consumer side, could the CPU reorder the loads?
A concurrent thread might observe valid == 1 but still read a stale or NULL
value for devp, resulting in a NULL pointer dereference during IO.
> +
> + /* Freshly installed: add its capacity to the statfs accounting */
> + if (devp) {
> + u64 sz = dax_fsdev_size(devp);
> +
> + scoped_guard(rwsem_write, &fsi->stats_sem)
> + fsi->total_capacity += sz;
> }
>
> return 0;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/0100019fc572ca94-ec363dd7-3a77-484b-b4b7-f2503a0931a6-000000@email.amazonses.com?part=11
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-03 2:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260803022730.75731-1-john@jagalactic.com>
2026-08-03 2:27 ` [PATCH V12 00/12] famfs: the Fabric-Attached Memory File System (standalone) John Groves
2026-08-03 2:28 ` [PATCH V12 01/12] dax: replace exported dax_dev_get() with non-allocating dax_dev_find() John Groves
2026-08-03 2:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 2:28 ` [PATCH V12 02/12] famfs: Module operations, fs_context, and mount John Groves
2026-08-03 2:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 2:28 ` [PATCH V12 03/12] famfs: Add daxdev table and dax notify_failure support John Groves
2026-08-03 2:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 2:28 ` [PATCH V12 04/12] famfs: Introduce inode_operations and super_operations John Groves
2026-08-03 2:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 2:29 ` [PATCH V12 05/12] famfs: Introduce file_operations read/write John Groves
2026-08-03 2:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 2:29 ` [PATCH V12 06/12] famfs: Introduce mmap and VM fault handling John Groves
2026-08-03 2:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 2:29 ` [PATCH V12 07/12] famfs: MAP_CREATE ioctl and fmap ingest (ABI 44) John Groves
2026-08-03 2:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 2:29 ` [PATCH V12 08/12] famfs: iomap_begin and file-to-dax offset resolution John Groves
2026-08-03 2:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 2:29 ` [PATCH V12 09/12] famfs: Register secondary daxdevs by path (FAMFSIOC_DAXDEV_OPEN) John Groves
2026-08-03 2:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 2:29 ` [PATCH V12 10/12] famfs: Add runtime operation-permission (opts) framework John Groves
2026-08-03 2:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 2:30 ` [PATCH V12 11/12] famfs: Report device capacity via statfs so df works John Groves
2026-08-03 2:58 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-03 2:30 ` [PATCH V12 12/12] famfs: Add documentation John Groves
2026-08-03 8:52 ` [PATCH V12 00/12] famfs: the Fabric-Attached Memory File System (standalone) Amir Goldstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260803025840.E72C41F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=john@jagalactic.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox