From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Muchun Song" <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] fsdax: materialize pmem vmemmap metadata on faults
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2026 12:53:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260903125312.16B761F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260903122128.12264-5-songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Global TLB flush broadcast inside global page table lock causing severe lock contention.
- [High] PMD fault materialization failure incorrectly returns VM_FAULT_OOM instead of falling back to PTE.
- [High] __vmemmap_materialize_page dereferences a potentially NULL PTE pointer if the DAX device is concurrently hot-unplugged.
--
commit 9e2a623911317e382af87ef795b2fc34f1686554
Author: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
fsdax: materialize pmem vmemmap metadata on faults
This patch opts pmem FS-DAX into the shared read-only vmemmap mode and
materializes private metadata before inserting a PFN into a userspace
mapping. It shifts private vmemmap allocation from device registration
to the first DAX fault for each metadata page.
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
> index 1fbba0d21c13d..89377301d51b0 100644
> --- a/fs/dax.c
> +++ b/fs/dax.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1877,6 +1878,10 @@ static vm_fault_t dax_fault_iter(struct vm_fault *vmf,
> if (err)
> return pmd ? VM_FAULT_FALLBACK : dax_fault_return(err);
>
> + err = vmemmap_materialize_page(pfn_to_page(pfn), pmd ? PMD_ORDER : 0);
[Severity: High]
Is there a risk of severe lock contention and RCU stalls here?
When a PMD fault triggers vmemmap_materialize_page(), it loops 512 times.
Inside that loop, __vmemmap_materialize_page() acquires the global
init_mm.page_table_lock and performs a synchronous TLB flush:
mm/sparse-vmemmap.c:__vmemmap_materialize_page() {
...
set_pte_at(&init_mm, addr, pte, mk_pte(candidate, PAGE_KERNEL));
flush_tlb_kernel_range(addr, addr + PAGE_SIZE);
put_page(template);
out:
spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
}
Could this cause the system to become unusable under load due to sequential
global IPI broadcasts while holding the global kernel page table lock?
[Severity: High]
Is there a race condition with DAX device hot-unplug here?
The prior call to dax_iomap_direct_access() acquires and then releases the
DAX SRCU read lock. By the time we call vmemmap_materialize_page(), there
is no lock preventing the DAX device from being hot-unplugged, which tears
down the vmemmap page tables.
If that happens concurrently, __vmemmap_materialize_page() will find
pmd_none(*pmd) is true in virt_to_kpte(), resulting in a NULL pte pointer.
Will the subsequent ptep_get(pte) dereference this NULL pointer and panic
the kernel?
> + if (err)
> + return dax_fault_return(err);
[Severity: High]
Does returning dax_fault_return(err) on a -ENOMEM error incorrectly trigger
an OOM kill for PMD faults?
dax_fault_return(err) translates -ENOMEM to VM_FAULT_OOM. If this
allocation fails during a PMD fault, shouldn't it return VM_FAULT_FALLBACK
instead, allowing the kernel to gracefully split the huge page and retry at
the PTE level (similar to how dax_iomap_direct_access() handles PMD fallback
just above this)?
> +
> *entry = dax_insert_entry(xas, vmf, iter, *entry, pfn, entry_flags);
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260903122128.12264-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-03 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-03 12:21 [PATCH 0/4] mm: Reduce struct page overhead for FS-DAX pmem Muchun Song
2026-09-03 12:21 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm: generalize vmemmap remap architecture support Muchun Song
2026-09-21 12:25 ` Oscar Salvador (SUSE)
2026-09-03 12:21 ` [PATCH 2/4] nvdimm/pmem: avoid HWPoison flag updates for clean pages Muchun Song
2026-09-03 12:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 7:33 ` Gupta, Pankaj
2026-09-21 12:53 ` Oscar Salvador (SUSE)
2026-09-22 2:33 ` Muchun Song
2026-09-03 12:21 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm: add shared read-only vmemmap support for FS-DAX Muchun Song
2026-09-21 6:42 ` Gupta, Pankaj
2026-09-21 9:33 ` Muchun Song
2026-09-21 11:05 ` Gupta, Pankaj
2026-09-21 13:09 ` Oscar Salvador (SUSE)
2026-09-22 3:17 ` Muchun Song
2026-09-03 12:21 ` [PATCH 4/4] fsdax: materialize pmem vmemmap metadata on faults Muchun Song
2026-09-03 12:53 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-05 3:26 ` Muchun Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260903125312.16B761F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox