NVDIMM Device and Persistent Memory development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: "david@fromorbit.com" <david@fromorbit.com>,
	"djwong@kernel.org" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	"dan.j.williams@intel.com" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"vishal.l.verma@intel.com" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	"dave.jiang@intel.com" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	"agk@redhat.com" <agk@redhat.com>,
	"snitzer@redhat.com" <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	"ira.weiny@intel.com" <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	"willy@infradead.org" <willy@infradead.org>,
	"vgoyal@redhat.com" <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"nvdimm@lists.linux.dev" <nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] pmem: refactor pmem_clear_poison()
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 23:45:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20fba522-c978-8d6b-5498-8e768897a129@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YjmOb0dSY9GG/Q6r@infradead.org>

On 3/22/2022 1:53 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> -static void hwpoison_clear(struct pmem_device *pmem,
>> -		phys_addr_t phys, unsigned int len)
>> +static phys_addr_t to_phys(struct pmem_device *pmem, phys_addr_t offset)
>>   {
>> +	return pmem->phys_addr + offset;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static sector_t to_sect(struct pmem_device *pmem, phys_addr_t offset)
>> +{
>> +	return (offset - pmem->data_offset) / 512;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static phys_addr_t to_offset(struct pmem_device *pmem, sector_t sector)
>> +{
>> +	return sector * 512 + pmem->data_offset;
>> +}
> 
> The multiplicate / divison using 512 could use shifts using
> SECTOR_SHIFT.

Nice, will do.

> 
>> +
>> +static void clear_hwpoison(struct pmem_device *pmem, phys_addr_t offset,
>> +		unsigned int len)
> 
>> +static void clear_bb(struct pmem_device *pmem, sector_t sector, long blks)
> 
> All these functions lack a pmem_ prefix.

Did you mean all of the helpers or just "clear_hwpoison" and "clear_bb"? 
   The reason I ask is that there are existing static helpers without 
pmem_ prefix, just short function names.

> 
>> +static blk_status_t __pmem_clear_poison(struct pmem_device *pmem,
>> +		phys_addr_t offset, unsigned int len,
>> +		unsigned int *blks)
>> +{
>> +	phys_addr_t phys = to_phys(pmem, offset);
>>   	long cleared;
>> +	blk_status_t rc;
>>   
>> +	cleared = nvdimm_clear_poison(to_dev(pmem), phys, len);
>> +	*blks = cleared / 512;
>> +	rc = (cleared < len) ? BLK_STS_IOERR : BLK_STS_OK;
>> +	if (cleared <= 0 || *blks == 0)
>> +		return rc;
> 
> This look odd.  I think just returing the cleared byte value would
> make much more sense:
> 
> static long __pmem_clear_poison(struct pmem_device *pmem,
> 		phys_addr_t offset, unsigned int len)
> {
> 	long cleared = nvdimm_clear_poison(to_dev(pmem), phys, len);
> 
> 	if (cleared > 0) {
> 		clear_hwpoison(pmem, offset, cleared);
> 		arch_invalidate_pmem(pmem->virt_addr + offset, len);
> 	}
> 
> 	return cleared;
> }

Yes, this is cleaner, will do.

Thanks!
-jane



  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-22 23:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-19  6:28 [PATCH v6 0/6] DAX poison recovery Jane Chu
2022-03-19  6:28 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] x86/mm: fix comment Jane Chu
2022-03-22  8:40   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-19  6:28 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] x86/mce: relocate set{clear}_mce_nospec() functions Jane Chu
2022-03-19  8:13   ` kernel test robot
2022-03-19  8:24   ` kernel test robot
2022-03-22  8:42   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-22 22:19     ` Jane Chu
2022-03-22 22:41   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-03-22 23:48     ` Jane Chu
2022-03-19  6:28 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] mce: fix set_mce_nospec to always unmap the whole page Jane Chu
2022-03-22  8:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-22 22:45     ` Jane Chu
2022-03-19  6:28 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] dax: add DAX_RECOVERY flag and .recovery_write dev_pgmap_ops Jane Chu
2022-03-19  8:24   ` kernel test robot
2022-03-19  8:44   ` kernel test robot
2022-03-22  9:01   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-22 23:05     ` Jane Chu
2022-03-23  5:45       ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-23 18:43         ` Jane Chu
2022-03-24  6:37           ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-26  6:31         ` Jane Chu
2022-03-19  6:28 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] pmem: refactor pmem_clear_poison() Jane Chu
2022-03-22  8:53   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-22 23:45     ` Jane Chu [this message]
2022-03-19  6:28 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] pmem: implement pmem_recovery_write() Jane Chu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20fba522-c978-8d6b-5498-8e768897a129@oracle.com \
    --to=jane.chu@oracle.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox