NVDIMM Device and Persistent Memory development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
To: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>,
	mpe@ellerman.id.au, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: dan.j.williams@intel.com, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev,
	atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rnsastry@linux.ibm.com,
	maddy@linux.ibm.com, kjain@linux.ibm.com,
	disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc/papr_scm: Fix nvdimm event mappings
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 10:45:39 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87czeac3no.fsf@vajain21.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220711034605.212683-1-kjain@linux.ibm.com>

Hi Kajol,

Thanks for the patch. Minor review comment below:

Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com> writes:

> Commit 4c08d4bbc089 ("powerpc/papr_scm: Add perf interface support")
> added performance monitoring support for papr-scm nvdimm devices via
> perf interface. Commit also added an array in papr_scm_priv
> structure called "nvdimm_events_map", which got filled based on the
> result of H_SCM_PERFORMANCE_STATS hcall. 
>
> Currently there is an assumption that the order of events in the
> stats buffer, returned by the hypervisor is same. And that order also
> matches with the events specified in nvdimm driver code. 
> But this assumption is not documented anywhere in Power Architecture
> Platform Requirements (PAPR) document. Although the order
> of events happens to be same on current systems, but it might
> not be true in future generation systems. Fix the issue, by
> adding a static mapping for nvdimm events to corresponding stat-id,
> and removing the dynamic map from papr_scm_priv structure.
>
> Fixes: 4c08d4bbc089 ("powerpc/papr_scm: Add perf interface support")
> Reported-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>

<snip>
> @@ -460,10 +480,9 @@ static void papr_scm_pmu_del(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
>  
>  static int papr_scm_pmu_check_events(struct papr_scm_priv *p, struct nvdimm_pmu *nd_pmu)
>  {
> -	struct papr_scm_perf_stat *stat;
>  	struct papr_scm_perf_stats *stats;
>  	u32 available_events;
> -	int index, rc = 0;
> +	int rc;
>  
>  	if (!p->stat_buffer_len)
>  		return -ENOENT;
> @@ -476,34 +495,12 @@ static int papr_scm_pmu_check_events(struct papr_scm_priv *p, struct nvdimm_pmu
>  	/* Allocate the buffer for phyp where stats are written */
>  	stats = kzalloc(p->stat_buffer_len, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!stats) {
> -		rc = -ENOMEM;
> -		return rc;
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Called to get list of events supported */
>  	rc = drc_pmem_query_stats(p, stats, 0);
> -	if (rc)
> -		goto out;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Allocate memory and populate nvdimm_event_map.
> -	 * Allocate an extra element for NULL entry
> -	 */
> -	p->nvdimm_events_map = kcalloc(available_events + 1,
> -				       sizeof(stat->stat_id),
> -				       GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!p->nvdimm_events_map) {
> -		rc = -ENOMEM;
> -		goto out;
> -	}
>  
> -	/* Copy all stat_ids to event map */
> -	for (index = 0, stat = stats->scm_statistic;
> -	     index < available_events; index++, ++stat) {
> -		memcpy(&p->nvdimm_events_map[index * sizeof(stat->stat_id)],
> -		       &stat->stat_id, sizeof(stat->stat_id));
> -	}
> -out:
>  	kfree(stats);
>  	return rc;
>  }

Earlier implementation of papr_scm_pmu_check_events() would copy the
contents of returned stat-ids to struct papr_scm_priv->nvdimm_events_map,
hence it was needed.

With static events map you dont really need to call
drc_pmem_query_stats() as that would have been already being done once
in papr_scm_probe() before papr_scm_pmu_register() is called:


papr_scm_probe()
{
...
	/* Try retrieving the stat buffer and see if its supported */
	stat_size = drc_pmem_query_stats(p, NULL, 0);
...
        papr_scm_pmu_register(p);
...
}

I would suggest replacing single callsite of papr_scm_pmu_check_events()
with the check

     if (!p->stat_buffer_len)
		goto pmu_check_events_err;

<snip>

-- 
Cheers
~ Vaibhav

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-12  5:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-11  3:46 [PATCH v2] powerpc/papr_scm: Fix nvdimm event mappings Kajol Jain
2022-07-12  5:15 ` Vaibhav Jain [this message]
2022-07-13  6:02   ` kajoljain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87czeac3no.fsf@vajain21.in.ibm.com \
    --to=vaibhav@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=rnsastry@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox