From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AF6D2C80
	for <nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>; Thu,  3 Feb 2022 13:43:19 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version
	:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:
	Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description;
	bh=L9MWc8UYxZnjnohmZnAuC5FiqjE2vmDPkIzVES+QO4s=; b=NvNnFAQXNhVp4BKwlT1g9pXVlX
	i++xG4vlBUFNHxnL4GjhrzQveqhT1mAiSRmm5iK5SvqJF/c0HLndoNz2WHwAGPHCxoi2KKGCe2MpD
	axH1YG3ygbSCv8eVb5ahb+RY6+Bu/jfle+dYzF3DUhoxJs3Lqm1TDr56/Rn4OhQYstWEt/H5G7BX9
	QZVlChvvAWkTxENz9Tu8zXfoZovZZ8DSmpbF5xplo5xbiT71v7zrMrEzVFcuXBiF3YL+PgrLs879Y
	7PLWZUFiI+zdGr8+0Ndi0m2NDmPpqKNRYfAA0yKMK5IGaKxlUuN0GEWwqr1LgNOQL13CE2fonU9fV
	YJVOLC0g==;
Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux))
	id 1nFcOA-001Sld-Su; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 13:43:06 +0000
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 05:43:06 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	"david@fromorbit.com" <david@fromorbit.com>,
	"djwong@kernel.org" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	"dan.j.williams@intel.com" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"vishal.l.verma@intel.com" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	"dave.jiang@intel.com" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	"agk@redhat.com" <agk@redhat.com>,
	"snitzer@redhat.com" <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	"ira.weiny@intel.com" <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	"willy@infradead.org" <willy@infradead.org>,
	"vgoyal@redhat.com" <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"nvdimm@lists.linux.dev" <nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] dax: introduce dax device flag DAXDEV_RECOVERY
Message-ID: <Yfvb6l/8AJJhRXKs@infradead.org>
References: <20220128213150.1333552-1-jane.chu@oracle.com>
 <20220128213150.1333552-3-jane.chu@oracle.com>
 <YfqFuUsvuUUUWKfu@infradead.org>
 <45b4a944-1fb1-73e2-b1f8-213e60e27a72@oracle.com>
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: nvdimm@lists.linux.dev
List-Id: <nvdimm.lists.linux.dev>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:nvdimm+subscribe@lists.linux.dev>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:nvdimm+unsubscribe@lists.linux.dev>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <45b4a944-1fb1-73e2-b1f8-213e60e27a72@oracle.com>
X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from <hch@infradead.org> by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html

On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 09:27:42PM +0000, Jane Chu wrote:
> Yeah, I see.  Would you suggest a way to pass the indication from
> dax_iomap_iter to dax_direct_access that the caller intends the
> callee to ignore poison in the range because the caller intends
> to do recovery_write? We tried adding a flag to dax_direct_access, and 
> that wasn't liked if I recall.

To me a flag seems cleaner than this magic, but let's wait for Dan to
chime in.