From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB362A31 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 08:53:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=uJdzlcEvij5Ft5CrLtuSMWt2NhA+02RXJxJray9JMj4=; b=M9YAGf4DfLFxhrF5jVExSCvkEh F5kzgwhWOl5Rhw1rx8z0Q1Tk614exWnNSewldl9jMIQzc5LkF+IK4YWl5o1M8da8g6a3+uEReKaod r5/OvpYjZUkLj6pqAIS8MdtWHq813xsfM01oCqrQ8Lkh4hInX2nfBYj87F9y1bQ/Zbe+Og8lYPy2Z ticSqIplcnJBoCCPg7jSYPfZ2qc9u0dQe5qoOxTYE9ugxK8ywSK6Uzrp7EzxHPM9d9cr0wR9Q5BBL R0/JmZJihfa3SxFUqAIfCSdBIoXY7cR0rP8Ds0Q9z0xu/nq6HUZDFVO5qbbMwetDdyls+5ZhfyYPU /y5sUiig==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nWaGF-00AVAX-ND; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 08:53:03 +0000 Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 01:53:03 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jane Chu Cc: david@fromorbit.com, djwong@kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, hch@infradead.org, vishal.l.verma@intel.com, dave.jiang@intel.com, agk@redhat.com, snitzer@redhat.com, dm-devel@redhat.com, ira.weiny@intel.com, willy@infradead.org, vgoyal@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] pmem: refactor pmem_clear_poison() Message-ID: References: <20220319062833.3136528-1-jane.chu@oracle.com> <20220319062833.3136528-6-jane.chu@oracle.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: nvdimm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220319062833.3136528-6-jane.chu@oracle.com> X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html > -static void hwpoison_clear(struct pmem_device *pmem, > - phys_addr_t phys, unsigned int len) > +static phys_addr_t to_phys(struct pmem_device *pmem, phys_addr_t offset) > { > + return pmem->phys_addr + offset; > +} > + > +static sector_t to_sect(struct pmem_device *pmem, phys_addr_t offset) > +{ > + return (offset - pmem->data_offset) / 512; > +} > + > +static phys_addr_t to_offset(struct pmem_device *pmem, sector_t sector) > +{ > + return sector * 512 + pmem->data_offset; > +} The multiplicate / divison using 512 could use shifts using SECTOR_SHIFT. > + > +static void clear_hwpoison(struct pmem_device *pmem, phys_addr_t offset, > + unsigned int len) > +static void clear_bb(struct pmem_device *pmem, sector_t sector, long blks) All these functions lack a pmem_ prefix. > +static blk_status_t __pmem_clear_poison(struct pmem_device *pmem, > + phys_addr_t offset, unsigned int len, > + unsigned int *blks) > +{ > + phys_addr_t phys = to_phys(pmem, offset); > long cleared; > + blk_status_t rc; > > + cleared = nvdimm_clear_poison(to_dev(pmem), phys, len); > + *blks = cleared / 512; > + rc = (cleared < len) ? BLK_STS_IOERR : BLK_STS_OK; > + if (cleared <= 0 || *blks == 0) > + return rc; This look odd. I think just returing the cleared byte value would make much more sense: static long __pmem_clear_poison(struct pmem_device *pmem, phys_addr_t offset, unsigned int len) { long cleared = nvdimm_clear_poison(to_dev(pmem), phys, len); if (cleared > 0) { clear_hwpoison(pmem, offset, cleared); arch_invalidate_pmem(pmem->virt_addr + offset, len); } return cleared; }