From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [5.9.137.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CE667B for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 08:44:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zn.tnic (p2e55d808.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [46.85.216.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id AE4521EC059E; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 10:44:33 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1649925873; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=XX6I/qqGd1pzt/wiJSFCoDXDtRPwRJSdws5FSZYXUmU=; b=DAr1jOmIuANW7nd0yzR+YRwJy3I/J/YwI4fxpfwPHrHEkJUIjGWub1Ij0cpeYNa9JmMX52 EMOwvk6izI4BPvli7Se2T8KTtgIeBVmLrRVCtAPEiyxE9VuF58cSvG2ZyPqobKTjXNSmnq WrPVb0riOoINF+t5+XSKJp7qDutAGfk= Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 10:44:37 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Jane Chu Cc: "david@fromorbit.com" , "djwong@kernel.org" , "dan.j.williams@intel.com" , "hch@infradead.org" , "vishal.l.verma@intel.com" , "dave.jiang@intel.com" , "agk@redhat.com" , "snitzer@redhat.com" , "dm-devel@redhat.com" , "ira.weiny@intel.com" , "willy@infradead.org" , "vgoyal@redhat.com" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "nvdimm@lists.linux.dev" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" , "x86@kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] x86/mm: fix comment Message-ID: References: <20220405194747.2386619-1-jane.chu@oracle.com> <20220405194747.2386619-2-jane.chu@oracle.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: nvdimm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 01:00:05AM +0000, Jane Chu wrote: > This change used to be folded in the mce patch, but for that I received > a review comment pointing out that the change is unrelated to the said > patch and doesn't belong, hence I pulled it out to stand by itself. :) Aha, someone is being very pedantic. For trivial unrelated changes like that I usually add them to a patch which already touches that file and put in the commit message: "While at it, fixup a function name in a comment." Less patches to handle. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette