From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD50C187D for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 11:46:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=QlLWgD8hH8VEMML/lnKrKbbOY8OsVVslAl3FeCo563k=; b=JD3StW5yL7XaTSGYt2pRl9vRoZ dV+b3CD7Ly+8dChwGxED8Qsiapud6PJqLFw76FTtkAWGcWQrjoR+JOrw8qewhPlqJPUiQJcQn+Y5k RbPNFCj38aBUXK9+8U9gqiRf9r+jdHO35BB/gFBiYF4qnYcIyNvgCF+yYDoWmfv7hRe9XEeniGRlF +QjHCk3QI8C+YcBHGOHlcZVpw0WSGUSjRq4MY5qQk/Fr8hM29Zb2E8VC5KUERhsLXu/04uFwmdx38 vRFhMfc6fWHgjzFmyl9tsrXH5orLkBNFSQ5QoZK2RIHxTnanUsZCEErNQAmWEfhZvF3nW/kkiKNAW Q/LVnu5Q==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oabhY-003RwO-Cq; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 11:46:08 +0000 Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 04:46:08 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Wu, Dennis" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , "Williams, Dan J" , "nvdimm@lists.linux.dev" , "Verma, Vishal L" , "Jiang, Dave" , "Weiny, Ira" Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI/NFIT: Add no_deepflush param to dynamic control flush operation Message-ID: References: <20220629083118.8737-1-dennis.wu@intel.com> <62ce1f0a57b84_6070c294a@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: nvdimm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 03:08:03AM +0000, Wu, Dennis wrote: > Hi, Dan, > Will we add this patch to some new kernel version? How about addressing my comments and explaining what the exact data integrity model is here first?