From: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
To: Neeraj Kumar <s.neeraj@samsung.com>,
linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gost.dev@samsung.com
Cc: a.manzanares@samsung.com, vishak.g@samsung.com,
neeraj.kernel@gmail.com, cpgs@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 14/20] cxl/region: Add devm_cxl_pmem_add_region() for pmem region creation
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 16:50:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e45d7687-fb93-4d2e-8cb4-e84c5a7ce782@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250917134116.1623730-15-s.neeraj@samsung.com>
On 9/17/25 6:41 AM, Neeraj Kumar wrote:
> devm_cxl_pmem_add_region() is used to create cxl region based on region
> information scanned from LSA.
>
> devm_cxl_add_region() is used to just allocate cxlr and its fields are
> filled later by userspace tool using device attributes (*_store()).
>
> Inspiration for devm_cxl_pmem_add_region() is taken from these device
> attributes (_store*) calls. It allocates cxlr and fills information
> parsed from LSA and calls device_add(&cxlr->dev) to initiate further
> region creation porbes
>
> Renamed __create_region() to cxl_create_region() and make it an exported
> routine. This will be used in later patch to create cxl region after
> fetching region information from LSA.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Kumar <s.neeraj@samsung.com>
> ---
> drivers/cxl/core/region.c | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/cxl/cxl.h | 12 ++++
> 2 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> index c325aa827992..d5c227ce7b09 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> @@ -2573,6 +2573,116 @@ static struct cxl_region *devm_cxl_add_region(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd,
> return ERR_PTR(rc);
> }
>
> +static ssize_t alloc_region_hpa(struct cxl_region *cxlr, u64 size)
> +{
> + int rc;
> +
> + ACQUIRE(rwsem_write_kill, rwsem)(&cxl_rwsem.region);
> + rc = ACQUIRE_ERR(rwsem_write_kill, &rwsem);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
Just a nit. Please conform to existing style in the subsystem for this new usage.
+ ACQUIRE(rwsem_write_kill, rwsem)(&cxl_rwsem.region);
+ if ((rc = ACQUIRE_ERR(rwsem_write_kill, &rwsem))))
+ return rc;
> +
> + if (!size)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return alloc_hpa(cxlr, size);
> +}
I think you can create another helper free_region_hpa() and call them in size_store() function to remove the duplicate code.
> +
> +static ssize_t alloc_region_dpa(struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled, u64 size)
> +{
> + int rc;
> +
> + if (!size)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (!IS_ALIGNED(size, SZ_256M))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + rc = cxl_dpa_free(cxled);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> +
> + return cxl_dpa_alloc(cxled, size);
> +}
> +
> +static struct cxl_region *
> +devm_cxl_pmem_add_region(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd, int id,
> + enum cxl_partition_mode mode,
Wouldn't this not needed since it would be CXL_PARTMODE_PMEM always? I also wonder if we need to rename devm_cxl_add_region() to devm_cxl_add_ram_region() to be explicit.
> + enum cxl_decoder_type type,
> + struct cxl_pmem_region_params *params,
> + struct cxl_decoder *cxld)
> +{
> + struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled;
> + struct cxl_region_params *p;
> + struct cxl_port *root_port;
> + struct device *dev;
> + int rc;
> +
> + struct cxl_region *cxlr __free(put_cxl_region) =
> + cxl_region_alloc(cxlrd, id);
> + if (IS_ERR(cxlr))
> + return cxlr;
> +
> + cxlr->mode = mode;
> + cxlr->type = type;
> +
> + dev = &cxlr->dev;
> + rc = dev_set_name(dev, "region%d", id);
> + if (rc)
> + return ERR_PTR(rc);
> +
> + p = &cxlr->params;
> + p->uuid = params->uuid;
> + p->interleave_ways = params->nlabel;
> + p->interleave_granularity = params->ig;
> +
> + rc = alloc_region_hpa(cxlr, params->rawsize);
> + if (rc)
> + return ERR_PTR(rc);
> +
> + cxled = to_cxl_endpoint_decoder(&cxld->dev);
> +
> + rc = cxl_dpa_set_part(cxled, CXL_PARTMODE_PMEM);
> + if (rc)
> + return ERR_PTR(rc);
> +
> + rc = alloc_region_dpa(cxled, params->rawsize);
> + if (rc)
> + return ERR_PTR(rc);
> +
> + /*
> + * TODO: Currently we have support of interleave_way == 1, where
> + * we can only have one region per mem device. It means mem device
> + * position (params->position) will always be 0. It is therefore
> + * attaching only one target at params->position
> + */
> + if (params->position)
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
EOPNOTSUPP?
Speaking of which, are there plans to support interleave in the near future?
DJ
> +
> + rc = attach_target(cxlr, cxled, params->position, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> + if (rc)
> + return ERR_PTR(rc);
> +
> + rc = __commit(cxlr);
> + if (rc)
> + return ERR_PTR(rc);
> +
> + rc = device_add(dev);
> + if (rc)
> + return ERR_PTR(rc);
> +
> + root_port = to_cxl_port(cxlrd->cxlsd.cxld.dev.parent);
> + rc = devm_add_action_or_reset(root_port->uport_dev,
> + unregister_region, cxlr);
> + if (rc)
> + return ERR_PTR(rc);
> +
> + dev_dbg(root_port->uport_dev, "%s: created %s\n",
> + dev_name(&cxlrd->cxlsd.cxld.dev), dev_name(dev));
> +
> + return no_free_ptr(cxlr);
> +}
> +
> static ssize_t __create_region_show(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd, char *buf)
> {
> return sysfs_emit(buf, "region%u\n", atomic_read(&cxlrd->region_id));
> @@ -2590,8 +2700,10 @@ static ssize_t create_ram_region_show(struct device *dev,
> return __create_region_show(to_cxl_root_decoder(dev), buf);
> }
>
> -static struct cxl_region *__create_region(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd,
> - enum cxl_partition_mode mode, int id)
> +struct cxl_region *cxl_create_region(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd,
> + enum cxl_partition_mode mode, int id,
> + struct cxl_pmem_region_params *pmem_params,
> + struct cxl_decoder *cxld)
> {
> int rc;
>
> @@ -2613,8 +2725,12 @@ static struct cxl_region *__create_region(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd,
> return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
> }
>
> + if (pmem_params)
> + return devm_cxl_pmem_add_region(cxlrd, id, mode,
> + CXL_DECODER_HOSTONLYMEM, pmem_params, cxld);
> return devm_cxl_add_region(cxlrd, id, mode, CXL_DECODER_HOSTONLYMEM);
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cxl_create_region, "CXL");
>
> static ssize_t create_region_store(struct device *dev, const char *buf,
> size_t len, enum cxl_partition_mode mode)
> @@ -2627,7 +2743,7 @@ static ssize_t create_region_store(struct device *dev, const char *buf,
> if (rc != 1)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - cxlr = __create_region(cxlrd, mode, id);
> + cxlr = cxl_create_region(cxlrd, mode, id, NULL, NULL);
> if (IS_ERR(cxlr))
> return PTR_ERR(cxlr);
>
> @@ -3523,8 +3639,9 @@ static struct cxl_region *construct_region(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd,
> struct cxl_region *cxlr;
>
> do {
> - cxlr = __create_region(cxlrd, cxlds->part[part].mode,
> - atomic_read(&cxlrd->region_id));
> + cxlr = cxl_create_region(cxlrd, cxlds->part[part].mode,
> + atomic_read(&cxlrd->region_id),
> + NULL, NULL);
> } while (IS_ERR(cxlr) && PTR_ERR(cxlr) == -EBUSY);
>
> if (IS_ERR(cxlr)) {
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> index b57597e55f7e..3abadc3dc82e 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> @@ -874,6 +874,10 @@ int cxl_add_to_region(struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled);
> struct cxl_dax_region *to_cxl_dax_region(struct device *dev);
> u64 cxl_port_get_spa_cache_alias(struct cxl_port *endpoint, u64 spa);
> void cxl_region_discovery(struct cxl_port *port);
> +struct cxl_region *cxl_create_region(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd,
> + enum cxl_partition_mode mode, int id,
> + struct cxl_pmem_region_params *params,
> + struct cxl_decoder *cxld);
> #else
> static inline bool is_cxl_pmem_region(struct device *dev)
> {
> @@ -899,6 +903,14 @@ static inline u64 cxl_port_get_spa_cache_alias(struct cxl_port *endpoint,
> static inline void cxl_region_discovery(struct cxl_port *port)
> {
> }
> +static inline struct cxl_region *
> +cxl_create_region(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd,
> + enum cxl_partition_mode mode, int id,
> + struct cxl_pmem_region_params *params,
> + struct cxl_decoder *cxld)
> +{
> + return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
> +}
> #endif
>
> void cxl_endpoint_parse_cdat(struct cxl_port *port);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-23 23:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20250917134126epcas5p3e20c773759b91f70a1caa32b9f6f27ff@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2025-09-17 13:40 ` [PATCH V3 00/20] Add CXL LSA 2.1 format support in nvdimm and cxl pmem Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:40 ` [PATCH V3 01/20] nvdimm/label: Introduce NDD_REGION_LABELING flag to set region label Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-19 23:10 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-22 12:41 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:40 ` [PATCH V3 02/20] nvdimm/label: CXL labels skip the need for 'interleave-set cookie' Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-19 23:31 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-17 13:40 ` [PATCH V3 03/20] nvdimm/label: Modify nd_label_base() signature Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-19 21:42 ` Ira Weiny
2025-09-19 23:34 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-22 12:44 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-24 21:02 ` Alison Schofield
2025-09-29 14:07 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:41 ` [PATCH V3 04/20] nvdimm/label: Update mutex_lock() with guard(mutex)() Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-19 21:55 ` Ira Weiny
2025-09-22 12:56 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-19 23:50 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-20 17:44 ` Ira Weiny
2025-09-22 13:01 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-24 21:42 ` Alison Schofield
2025-09-29 14:19 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:41 ` [PATCH V3 05/20] nvdimm/namespace_label: Add namespace label changes as per CXL LSA v2.1 Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 14:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-19 22:00 ` Ira Weiny
2025-09-22 13:05 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-19 23:59 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-22 13:03 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-23 21:48 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-29 13:28 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:41 ` [PATCH V3 06/20] nvdimm/region_label: Add region label update support Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 15:36 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-22 13:12 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-10-06 16:56 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-22 23:11 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-29 13:24 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:41 ` [PATCH V3 07/20] nvdimm/region_label: Add region label delete support Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-22 21:37 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-29 13:13 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:41 ` [PATCH V3 08/20] nvdimm/label: Include region label in slot validation Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-22 22:17 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-29 13:17 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-24 21:30 ` Alison Schofield
2025-09-29 14:10 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:41 ` [PATCH V3 09/20] nvdimm/namespace_label: Skip region label during ns label DPA reservation Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:41 ` [PATCH V3 10/20] nvdimm/namespace_label: Skip region label during namespace creation Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:41 ` [PATCH V3 11/20] nvdimm/region_label: Preserve cxl region information from region label Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:41 ` [PATCH V3 12/20] nvdimm/region_label: Export routine to fetch region information Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-23 20:23 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-29 13:26 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:41 ` [PATCH V3 13/20] cxl/mem: Refactor cxl pmem region auto-assembling Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-23 22:37 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-29 13:30 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-10-06 15:55 ` Dave Jiang
2025-11-07 12:39 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-11-12 15:55 ` Dave Jiang
2025-11-13 7:27 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:41 ` [PATCH V3 14/20] cxl/region: Add devm_cxl_pmem_add_region() for pmem region creation Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-23 23:50 ` Dave Jiang [this message]
2025-09-29 13:37 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:41 ` [PATCH V3 15/20] cxl: Add a routine to find cxl root decoder on cxl bus using cxl port Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-24 18:11 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-29 13:40 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-10-06 16:02 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-17 13:41 ` [PATCH V3 16/20] cxl/mem: Preserve cxl root decoder during mem probe Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-24 18:23 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-29 13:52 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-24 21:38 ` Alison Schofield
2025-09-29 14:13 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:41 ` [PATCH V3 17/20] cxl/pmem: Preserve region information into nd_set Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:41 ` [PATCH V3 18/20] cxl/pmem_region: Prep patch to accommodate pmem_region attributes Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-24 18:53 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-29 13:57 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-10-06 16:06 ` Dave Jiang
2025-11-07 12:49 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-11-12 15:40 ` Dave Jiang
2025-11-13 7:29 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-10-06 16:09 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-17 13:41 ` [PATCH V3 19/20] cxl/pmem_region: Add sysfs attribute cxl region label updation/deletion Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-24 20:25 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-29 14:00 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:41 ` [PATCH V3 20/20] cxl/pmem: Add CXL LSA 2.1 support in cxl pmem Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-24 20:47 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-29 14:02 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-10-06 16:13 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-17 14:50 ` [PATCH V3 00/20] Add CXL LSA 2.1 format support in nvdimm and " Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-17 15:38 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-22 12:36 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-23 23:04 ` Alison Schofield
2025-09-29 13:33 ` Neeraj Kumar
[not found] <CGME20250917133050epcas5p3979792644e47ee94956bcf00c84a832e@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2025-09-17 13:29 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:29 ` [PATCH V3 14/20] cxl/region: Add devm_cxl_pmem_add_region() for pmem region creation Neeraj Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e45d7687-fb93-4d2e-8cb4-e84c5a7ce782@intel.com \
--to=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=a.manzanares@samsung.com \
--cc=cpgs@samsung.com \
--cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neeraj.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=s.neeraj@samsung.com \
--cc=vishak.g@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox