ocfs2-devel.oss.oracle.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: avoid direct write if we fall back to buffered
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:58:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100414015819.GE5530@mail.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201004081547.24593.lidongyang@novell.com>

On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 03:47:24PM +0800, Li Dongyang wrote:
> when we fall back to buffered write from direct write, we call
> __generic_file_aio_write but that will end up doing direct write
> even we are only prepared to do buffered write because the file
> has O_DIRECT flag set. This is a fix for
> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591039

	We need to evaluate what __g_f_a_w() is doing and make sure
we're matching it appropriately for ocfs2.

> +	ret = file_remove_suid(file);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out_dio;

	NAK.  We do suid checks in ocfs2_prepare_inode_for_write().
Calling file_remove_suid() is outside of ocfs2's locking.  It calls
->setattr() which has its own rules in ocfs2.

> +	file_update_time(file);

	We have special behaviors regarding time updates for ocfs2
direct I/O.  This might want to live right next to the call to
generic_file_buffered_write().  But maybe not.  It needs to be checked.

Joel

-- 

To spot the expert, pick the one who predicts the job will take the
longest and cost the most.

Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker at oracle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-04-14  1:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-08  7:47 [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: avoid direct write if we fall back to buffered Li Dongyang
2010-04-08 18:41 ` Sunil Mushran
2010-04-09  2:27   ` Li Dongyang
2010-04-09  2:38     ` Tao Ma
2010-04-09  3:00       ` Li Dongyang
2010-04-09  3:32         ` Tao Ma
2010-04-09  9:20           ` Li Dongyang
2010-04-09 17:36             ` Sunil Mushran
2010-04-09  7:58   ` Coly Li
2010-04-09  7:56     ` Tao Ma
2010-04-14  1:58 ` Joel Becker [this message]
2010-04-14  7:42   ` Li Dongyang
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-04-10  7:37 Dong Yang Li
2010-04-10  9:37 ` Joel Becker
2010-04-10  9:48   ` Li Dongyang
2010-04-12  5:16 ` Tao Ma
2010-04-12  5:31   ` Li Dongyang
2010-04-12  6:24     ` Tao Ma
2010-04-14  2:44       ` Tao Ma
2010-04-14  5:47         ` Li Dongyang
2010-04-14  6:08           ` Tao Ma
2010-04-13 23:54   ` Joel Becker
2010-04-14  0:13     ` Tao Ma
2010-04-14  5:58     ` Li Dongyang
2010-04-14 19:20       ` Joel Becker
2010-04-22 14:13         ` Li Dongyang
2010-04-23 20:06           ` Joel Becker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100414015819.GE5530@mail.oracle.com \
    --to=joel.becker@oracle.com \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).