[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] Track negative dentries

[Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>]

On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:23:33AM +0800, Wengang Wang wrote:
> Actually I meant two dentries in the two run of 'ls -l'.
> At the first run, a dentry, dentry A, is created. Because fileA doesn't exist,
> dentry->d_inode is NULL. Then a do_revalidate() is run,
> ocfs2_dentry_revalidate() returns "not valid" since d_inode is NULL.
> Thus the dentry A is unhashed from cache by d_invalidate().
> At the second run of 'ls -l', since dentry A is unhashed, there is no dentry for
> fileA exist in dentry hash, a new dentry, dentry B, is created. The new dentry B
> don't have any info about parent ino.
> 
> I found that when testing my patch for the "track negative dentries".
> Maybe I misunderstand something?

	When that dentry gets linked into the tree, it will point to its
d_parent.  So the parent inode is dentryB->d_parent->d_inode.

Joel

-- 

"Too much walking shoes worn thin.
 Too much trippin' and my soul's worn thin.
 Time to catch a ride it leaves today
 Her name is what it means.
 Too much walking shoes worn thin."

Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker at oracle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127