From: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 3/7] Differentiate between no_controld and with_controld
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:17:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131008181750.GM5358@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52541AB6.4000004@suse.de>
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 09:46:14AM -0500, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
> On 10/07/2013 07:43 PM, Joel Becker wrote:
> >No. It should not be on disk, and it must not be permanent. Consider a
> >cluster running at version 1.2. One by one, each node is upgraded to a
> >new version of ocfs2 that supports the 1.3 protocol. Each node will
> >still reconnect to the cluster at 1.2 due to the third rule above. But
> >when the entire cluster is taken down for maintenance, they will start
> >back up at 1.3. In the future, we may even support online update to the
> >new version when every node has it.
>
> Yes, the method I proposed works with what you mentioned and it is
> not permanent. Let me elaborate on what I said. A node on mount
> after setting up DLM would:
>
> Requests a non-blocking EX lock on the protocol version file.
> If it fails, it takes a PR lock on the version file.
> If it succeeds, it writes it's own version info *overwriting* what
> was before and downconverts to PR lock. ie, even if there is a
> higher version in the file before.
>
> This could be done with existing inode locks and no other locking
> infrastructure needs to be added.
>
> This way if the first node is 1.2, the whole cluster will be 1.2
> even if a node with 1.3 joins. The first node decides what the
> entire cluster will be. Later, if all nodes have upgraded to 1.3,
> and the whole cluster restarts after a total cluster shutdown, the
> whole cluster will start with 1.3
>
> The reason I proposed a file is because this is ocfs2 specific, and
> ideally should not be mixed with dlm stuff.
I understood what you said, and the entire point of using the
network-based DLM is to stay away from disk structures for locking.
There is nothing wrong with using the DLM for DLM things.
Joel
--
"In the long run...we'll all be dead."
-Unknown
http://www.jlbec.org/
jlbec at evilplan.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-08 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-27 17:07 [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 3/7] Differentiate between no_controld and with_controld Goldwyn Rodrigues
2013-09-27 19:02 ` Joel Becker
2013-09-28 14:39 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2013-10-08 0:00 ` Joel Becker
2013-10-08 0:17 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2013-10-08 0:43 ` Joel Becker
2013-10-08 14:46 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2013-10-08 18:17 ` Joel Becker [this message]
2013-10-02 9:49 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2013-10-03 1:58 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131008181750.GM5358@localhost \
--to=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox